Why are rates of asthma in developed countries higher now than in the past?

in children includes the development of the ISAAC programme, which has shown large variations globally in the prevalence of asthma symptoms. Time trends in the prevalence of asthma symptoms have shown a mixed picture of increases in low prevalence centres, and a plateau or even a decrease in high prevalence centres. A range of environmental factors have been studied and some potentially protective associations have been found, as well as potentially aggravating factors. Atopy has less influence on the prevalence of symptoms of asthma in low and middle income countries. Breast feeding exerts a protective effect only on non-atopic asthma in non-affluent countries. Future research should explore these areas further.

Section snippets

Background

What causes asthma is a pressing question, but the answers remain elusive. Until the mid 1980s most studies of asthma had been undertaken within high income countries whose populations originated from the British Isles, and thus the broader distribution of the prevalence of asthma in the world was largely unknown.1 Studies of the epidemiology of asthma have burgeoned since that time, reflecting worldwide concern that asthma is increasing in prevalence and is an important cause of morbidity not

Global variations in asthma prevalence

Key findings from ISAAC Phase One [1994–1996] included large variations in the worldwide prevalence of symptoms of asthma which were found even among genetically similar populations8, 11 suggesting that environmental factors play an important role.

Further study of the global prevalence and severity of asthma symptoms was undertaken in ISAAC Phase Three, conducted between 2000 and 2003, involving 798,685 adolescents from 233 centres in 97 countries, and 388,811 children from 144 centres in 61

Time trends in asthma prevalence

Most centres who undertook ISAAC Phase One repeated the study after at least five years, reflecting the large worldwide interest in time trends of prevalence. For most centres it was the first opportunity to obtain time trends information. Following reports from English language countries in the 1990s of increases in asthma prevalence from the 1980s, continuing increases in prevalence had been expected. However, ISAAC found that in most high prevalence countries, particularly the English

What environmental factors are important?

The central ISAAC approach has been to study symptoms of disease between populations, which has naturally led to ecological analyses between symptom prevalence values and potential environmental exposures. As Rose states, “the primary determinants of disease are mainly economic and social, and therefore its remedies must also be economic and social”13, and this has been the thrust of the ISAAC approach. If the environment of populations is important in the occurrence of asthma,

The influence of country income and atopy

The ecological economic analysis undertaken in the ISAAC Phase Three global study of asthma prevalence12 revealed a significant trend towards a higher prevalence of current wheeze in centres in higher income countries in both age groups, but this trend was reversed for the prevalence of severe symptoms among children with current wheeze, especially in the adolescents. Although asthma symptoms tended to be more prevalent in high income countries, they appeared to be more severe in low and middle

In conclusion

The asthma epidemic experienced by developed nations over the last 30 years is now affecting developing countries as they become more urbanised. Many of the world's most populous developing countries are now showing similar increases in prevalence of asthma to those experienced in many developed countries. The size of the increases in prevalence implies a large impact on the health of populations. Environmental factors are the key to explain the variations and changes in asthma prevalence. Some

Conflict of interest

Innes Asher is the Chairperson of The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood.

References [40]

  • J. Mallol

    Asthma in Latin America: where the asthma causative/protective hypotheses fail

    Allergol Immunopathol [Madr]

    [2008]

  • S.G. Johansson et al.

    Revised nomenclature for allergy for global use: Report of the Nomenclature Review Committee of the World Allergy Organization, October 2003

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    [2004]

  • R. Beasley et al.

    Association between paracetamol use in infancy and childhood, and risk of asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis, and eczema in children aged 6–7 years: analysis from Phase Three of the ISAAC programme

    Lancet

    [2008]

  • S.K. Weiland et al.

    Intake of trans fatty acids and prevalence of childhood asthma and allergies in Europe. ISAAC Steering Committee

    Lancet

    [1999]

  • M.G. Marmot

    Improvement of social environment to improve health

    Lancet

    [1998]

  • M.I. Asher et al.

    Epidemiology of Asthma

  • H.J. Zar et al.

    Global burden of pediatric respiratory illness and the implications for management and prevention

    Pediatr Pulmonol

    [2003]

  • M. Asher et al.

    International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood [ISAAC]: rationale and methods

    Eur Respir J

    [1995]

  • E. von Mutius et al.

    Prevalence of asthma and allergic disorders among children in united Germany: a descriptive comparison

    BMJ

    [1992]

  • P. Ellwood et al.

    The international study of asthma and allergies in childhood [ISAAC]: Phase Three rationale and methods

    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis

    [2005]

  • D.A. Enarson

    Fostering a spirit of critical thinking: the ISAAC story

    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis

    [2005]

  • Ellwood P, Williams H, Aït-Khaled N, Björkstén B, Robertson C, and the ISAAC Phase Three Study Group. Translation of...
  • ISAAC Steering Committee

    Worldwide variations in the prevalence of asthma symptoms: the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood [ISAAC]

    Eur Respir J

    [1998]

  • P.G. Burney et al.

    The European Community Respiratory Health Survey

    Eur Respir J

    [1994]

  • N. Pearce et al.

    Comparison of asthma prevalence in the ISAAC and the ECRHS. ISAAC Steering Committee and the European Community Respiratory Health Survey. International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood

    Eur Respir J

    [2000]

  • ISAAC Steering Committee

    Worldwide variation in prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and atopic eczema: ISAAC

    Lancet

    [1998]

  • C. Lai et al.

    Global variation in the prevalence and severity of asthma symptoms: Phase Three of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood [ISAAC]

    Thorax

    [2009]

  • G. Rose

    The strategy of preventive medicine

    [1992]

  • A.W. Stewart et al.

    The relationship of per capita gross national product to the prevalence of symptoms of asthma and other atopic diseases in children [ISAAC]. [see comments.]

    Int J Epidemiol

    [2001]

  • R.B. Newson et al.

    Paracetamol sales and atopic disease in children and adults: an ecological analysis

    Eur Respir J

    [2000]

  • Navigate DownView more references

    Cited by [68]

    • 42 - The Epidemiology of Asthma

      2019, Kendig's Disorders of the Respiratory Tract in Children

      Show abstractNavigate Down

      Epidemiology is the study of populations to discover modifiable factors that contribute to disease occurrence and natural history with a view to reducing disease burden through prevention. Asthma is a complex, polygenic disease with heterogeneous manifestations making it difficult to define precisely in population studies. Despite this, global efforts to harmonize outcome definitions have led to detailed understanding of the temporal and spatial variations of asthma prevalence in children. Asthma prevalence notably increased in high-income countries during the final three decades of the 20th century, but the cause for this has never been fully established.

      Early life has been implicated as a critical period for the development of asthma. Many environmental influences have been considered as potential risk factors for asthma, but few have been associated with more than modest increases in risk. One barrier to identifying causal risk factors is the clustering of environmental factors with consequent confounding of relationships between environment and disease. Thus even strong and reproducible associations can seldom be regarded as causal without experimental evidence, which is generally lacking.

      Despite these difficulties, new approaches to asthma classification, meticulous observations in birth cohorts, technological advances that enable assignment or genetic risk and identification of biomarkers for disease pathways, and analytical advances have contributed to real advances in understanding asthma pathogenesis. The interaction of allergic sensitization with respiratory viral infections offers a promising target for the development of preventative interventions.

    • Evidence in immunotherapy for paediatric respiratory allergy: Advances and recommendations

      2016, Allergologia et Immunopathologia

      Citation Excerpt :

      Allergic respiratory diseases are a major health problem in the paediatric population due to their high level of prevalence and chronicity, as well as to their relevance in both the cost of healthcare and the quality of life of the patients and their families. According to large population-based studies, the prevalence of asthma and allergic rhinitis [AR] in children has increased in recent decades, presenting wheezing in the past year in up to 12% of children aged 6–7 years and to 14% at 13–14 years; AR has a prevalence of 15%.1–3 The total costs of asthma are greater in children than in adults due to the greater severity of the disease in this population,4 decreasing their quality of life in terms of health.5

      Show abstractNavigate Down

      Allergic respiratory diseases are major health problems in paediatric population due their high level of prevalence and chronicity, and to their relevance in the costs and quality of life. One of the most important risk factors for the development of airway diseases in children and adolescents is atopy. The mainstays for the treatment of these diseases are avoiding allergens, controlling symptoms, and preventing them through sustained desensitization by allergen immunotherapy [AIT]. AIT is a treatment option that consists in the administration of increasing amounts of allergens to modify the biological response to them, inducing long-term tolerance even after treatment has ended. This treatment approach has shown to decrease symptoms and improve quality of life, becoming cost effective for a large number of patients. In addition, it is considered the only treatment that can influence the natural course of the disease by targeting the cause of the allergic inflammatory response. The aim of this publication is to reflect the advances of AIT in the diagnosis and treatment of allergic respiratory diseases in children and adolescents reviewing articles published since 2000, establishing evidence categories to support the strength of the recommendations based on evidence. The first part of the article covers the prerequisite issues to understand how AIT is effective, such as the correct etiologic and clinical diagnosis of allergic respiratory diseases. Following this, the article outlines the advancements in understanding the mechanisms by which AIT achieve immune tolerance to allergens. Administration routes, treatment regimens, dose and duration, efficacy, safety, and factors associated with adherence are also reviewed. Finally, the article reviews future advances in the research of AIT.

    • Thermal and environmental conditions in Shanghai households: Risk factors for childhood health

      2016, Building and Environment

      Citation Excerpt :

      Many epidemiological studies have demonstrated an increase in allergic diseases in the past 40 years worldwide [1–3].

      Show abstractNavigate Down

      An overall investigation of children’s health status, residential thermal environment, and pollutants was conducted in the homes primary school children during winter and summer in Shanghai, China. The houses were divided into Group A [unhealthy child living] and Group B [healthy child living]. During a two-week monitoring period in winter, indoor temperatures in Group A were significantly lower than in Group B [1–2 °C; p 

    Chủ Đề