When choosing between GeForce MX130 and GeForce MX150, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins [using adapters is not recommended]. This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce MX130 and GeForce MX150.
GeForce MX130 and GeForce MX150 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce MX130 and GeForce MX150 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX130 or GeForce MX150 here:
Card đồ họa rời NVIDIA GeForce MX110 và MX130 phù hợp với các bạn học sinh sinh viên có nhu cầu vừa học tập vừa giải trí với các game nhẹ như LOL và Fifa.
Hai phiên bản card đồ họa rời NVIDIA GeForce MX110 và MX130 phù hợp với các bạn học sinh sinh viên có nhu cầu vừa học tập vừa giải trí với các game nhẹ như LOL và Fifa. Bên cạnh đó, các nhân viên văn phòng có nhu cầu khá tương tự cũng có thể sử dụng những laptop có hai loại card rời này.
MX130 cho hiệu năng mạnh mẽ hơn MX110. Trên lý thuyết, khi so sánh với card tích hợp Intel UHD Graphics 620, MX110 cho hiệu năng gấp 1.5 lần, còn MX130 lại cho đến 2.5 lần.
Tuy nhiên, khi đo đạc trên thực tế thì hiệu năng của cả hai không chênh lệch nhau nhiều, card MX130 thường cho hiệu năng gấp 1.3 lần MX110.
Với MX110 và MX130, các laptop học tập - văn phòng có khả năng xử lý đồ họa tốt hơn, giúp chỉnh sửa video, học tập và chơi game tốt hơn.
Để đáp ứng nhu cầu vừa học vừa chơi của các bạn sinh viên, hoặc nhu cầu giải trí nhẹ nhàng của dân văn phòng, card rời này chiến tốt LOL và Fifa. Tuy nhiên, việc chơi các game đòi hỏi đồ họa cao như Apex Legends hay GTA V dù có thể chiến được ở mức cấu hình thấp nhưng khá giật lag.
MX110 Low [HD] Medium [Full HD] High [Full HD] Ultra [Full HD] Far Cry 5 22 FPS 10 FPS 9 FPS 8 FPS Fortnite 65 FPS 25 FPS 16 FPS 12 FPS FIFA 18 [2017] 107 FPS 59 FPS 54 FPS 46 FPS PUBG 41 FPS 18 FPS 17 FPS 12 FPS
Trên 50 FPS là chơi được, khá ổn. Trên 60 FPS là mượt mà.
MX130 Low [HD] Medium [Full HD] High [Full HD] Ultra [Full HD] Far Cry 5 27 FPS 14 FPS 13 FPS 13 FPS Fortnite 78 FPS 32 FPS 24 FPS 16 FPS FIFA 18 [2017] N/A N/A 54 FPS 44 FPS PUBG 56 FPS 23 FPS 21 FPS 14 FPS
Trên 50 FPS là chơi được, khá ổn. Trên 60 FPS là mượt mà.
Một số mẫu laptop đang kinh doanh tại Thế Giới Di Động:
Nếu còn thắc mắc gì về hai phiên bản card đồ họa rời NVIDIA GeForce MX110 và MX130 thì bạn hãy để lại bình luận để Thế Giới Di Động giúp bạn giải đáp nhé!
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores384384Core clock speed1468 MHz1122 MHzBoost clock speed1532 MHz1242 MHzNumber of transistors1,800 millionno dataManufacturing process technology14 nm28 nmPower consumption [TDP]25 Watt [10 - 25 Watt TGP]15-25 WattTexture fill rate24.9129.81Floating-point performance1,127 gflops953.9 gflops
Size and compatibility
Information on GeForce MX150 and GeForce MX130 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop sizelargemedium sizedInterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory typeGDDR5DDR3, GDDR5Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GBMemory bus width64 Bit64 BitMemory clock speed6008 MHz5012 MHzMemory bandwidth40.1 GB/s40.1 GB/sShared memory--
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones [so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips]. OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX12 [12_1]12 [11_0]Shader Model6.45.1OpenGL4.64.6OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126CUDA6.1+
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce MX150 5.86
+22.3%
MX150 outperforms MX130 by 22% in our combined benchmark results.
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 [the last being done in 4K resolution if possible], and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
GeForce MX150 2277
+22.2%
MX150 outperforms MX130 by 22% in Passmark.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
GeForce MX130 11968
+8.9%
MX130 outperforms MX150 by 9% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 16%
GeForce MX150 4494
+56.3%
MX150 outperforms MX130 by 56% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Benchmark coverage: 14%
GeForce MX150 3104
+40.9%
MX150 outperforms MX130 by 41% in 3DMark Fire Strike Score.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
GeForce MX150 3488
+48.7%
MX150 outperforms MX130 by 49% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
GeForce MX150 19132
+40.6%
MX150 outperforms MX130 by 41% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
GeForce MX150 9318
+45.4%
MX150 outperforms MX130 by 45% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 8%
GeForce MX150 223740
+31.2%
MX150 outperforms MX130 by 31% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
GeForce MX150 8318
+30.9%
MX150 outperforms MX130 by 31% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.
GeekBench 5 CUDA
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.
Benchmark coverage: 4%
GeForce MX150 9799
+42.6%
MX150 outperforms MX130 by 43% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.
Unigine Heaven 3.0
This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.
Benchmark coverage: 4%
MX150 outperforms MX130 by 50% in Unigine Heaven 3.0.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD27 18 1440p24 18−20 4K19 14−16
Performance in popular games
Full HD Low Preset
Cyberpunk 207710−11 4
Full HD Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey19
+138%
8−9
−138%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Battlefield 539
+179%
14−16
−179%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare22
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 207711
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry 517
+21.4%
14
−21.4%
Far Cry New Dawn18
+80%
10−11
−80%
Forza Horizon 425
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Hitman 312−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Horizon Zero Dawn12
+9.1%
11
−9.1%
Red Dead Redemption 214
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider17
+30.8%
13
−30.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion14
+27.3%
11
−27.3%
Full HD High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey13
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Battlefield 532
+129%
14−16
−129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare7
−129%
16−18
+129%
Cyberpunk 20777
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Far Cry 516
+23.1%
13
−23.1%
Far Cry New Dawn17
+70%
10−11
−70%
Forza Horizon 421
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Hitman 312−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Horizon Zero Dawn10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Metro Exodus6
+100%
3
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 210−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider11
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt19
+35.7%
14
−35.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion11
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Full HD Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey7
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Battlefield 526
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 207710−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Far Cry 514
+16.7%
12
−16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn15
+50%
10−11
−50%
Forza Horizon 414
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt11
+57.1%
7
−57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
1440p High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Hitman 310
+25%
8−9
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 24−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
1440p Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Battlefield 54−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 20773−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 510−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Forza Horizon 49−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
4K High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Hitman 36−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Metro Exodus1−2 0−1 Red Dead Redemption 23−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
4K Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Battlefield 51−2 0−1 Cyberpunk 20771−2 0−1 Far Cry 56−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 47−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
This is how GeForce MX150 and GeForce MX130 compete in popular games:
1080p resolution:
- GeForce MX150 is 50% faster than GeForce MX130
1440p resolution:
- GeForce MX150 is 33.3% faster than GeForce MX130
4K resolution:
- GeForce MX150 is 35.7% faster than GeForce MX130
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX150 is 200% faster than the GeForce MX130.
- in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX130 is 129% faster than the GeForce MX150.
All in all, in popular games:
- GeForce MX150 is ahead in 50 tests [79%]
- GeForce MX130 is ahead in 5 tests [8%]
- there's a draw in 8 tests [13%]
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score 5.86 4.79 Recency 16 May 2017 1 January 2018 Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm Power consumption [TDP] 25 Watt 15 Watt
The GeForce MX150 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX130 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Cast your own vote
Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.
GeForce MX150
GeForce MX130
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
User ratings: view and submit
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.
Rate NVIDIA GeForce MX150 on a scale of 1 to 5:
Rate NVIDIA GeForce MX130 on a scale of 1 to 5:
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.