GPU Name G92B GPU Variant N10E-GLM-B2 Architecture Tesla Foundry TSMC Process Size 55 nm Transistors 754 million Density 2.9M / mm² Die Size 260 mm² Chip Package FCBGA-1148
Mobile Graphics
Relative Performance
Based on TPU review data: "Performance Summary" at 1920x1080, 4K for 2080 Ti and faster.
Performance estimated based on architecture, shader count and clocks.
Clock Speeds
GPU Clock 600 MHz Shader Clock 1500 MHz Memory Clock 1000 MHz 2 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size 1024 MB Memory Type GDDR3 Memory Bus 256 bit Bandwidth 64.00 GB/s
Render Config
Shading Units 96 TMUs 48 ROPs 16 SM Count 12 L2 Cache 64 KB
Theoretical Performance
Pixel Rate 9.600 GPixel/s Texture Rate 28.80 GTexel/s FP32 [float] 288.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Slot Width MXM Module TDP 75 W Outputs Portable Device Dependent Power Connectors None Board Number P678 SKU 501
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores96512Core clock speed600 MHz600 MHzNumber of transistors754 million1,500 millionManufacturing process technology55 nm28 nmPower consumption [TDP]75 Watt33 WattTexture fill rate28.8021.60Floating-point performance288 gflops691.2 gflops
Size and compatibility
Information on Quadro FX 2800M and FirePro M4000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop sizelargemedium sizedBus supportno datan/aInterfaceMXM-B [3.0]MXM-A [3.0]Form factorno dataMXM-ASupplementary power connectorsno dataNone
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GBMemory bus width256 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed1000 MHz4500 MHzMemory bandwidth64 GB/s72 GB/sShared memory--
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones [so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips]. OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputsStereoOutput3Dno data1
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX11.1 [10_0]12 [11_1]Shader Model4.05.1OpenGL3.34.6OpenCL1.11.2VulkanN/A1.2.131CUDA+no data
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
FirePro M4000 outperforms Quadro FX 2800M by 285% in our combined benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 [the last being done in 4K resolution if possible], and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
FirePro M4000 outperforms Quadro FX 2800M by 286% in Passmark.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
FirePro M4000 8628
+49.2%
FirePro M4000 outperforms Quadro FX 2800M by 49% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro FX 2800M and FirePro M4000. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC [SHA256] no data 79 Mh/s
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD31 27
Performance in popular games
Full HD Low Preset
Cyberpunk 20773−4 7−8
Full HD Medium Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 20773−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Forza Horizon 42−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Hitman 30−1 9−10 Red Dead Redemption 23−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Full HD High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 20773−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Forza Horizon 42−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Hitman 30−1 9−10 Metro Exodus1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Red Dead Redemption 23−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Full HD Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 20773−4 7−8 Forza Horizon 42−3 14−16 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt3−4 9−10
1440p High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Hitman 33−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Horizon Zero Dawn7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
1440p Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 20771−2 2−3 Far Cry 51−2 6−7
4K High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Hitman 31−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 20−1 2−3
4K Ultra Preset
Far Cry 52−3 4−5 Far Cry New Dawn5−6 7−8 Forza Horizon 40−1 5−6
This is how FX 2800M and FirePro M4000 compete in popular games:
1080p resolution:
- FX 2800M is 14.8% faster than FirePro M4000
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the FirePro M4000 is 600% faster than the FX 2800M.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, FirePro M4000 surpassed FX 2800M in all 27 of our tests.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score 1.08 4.16 Recency 1 December 2009 1 July 2012 Memory bus width 256 128 Pipelines / CUDA cores 96 512 Memory bandwidth 64 72 Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm Power consumption [TDP] 75 Watt 33 Watt
The FirePro M4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 2800M in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Cast your own vote
Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.
Quadro FX 2800M
FirePro M4000
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
User ratings: view and submit
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.
Rate NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M on a scale of 1 to 5:
Rate AMD FirePro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.