So sánh gt730 và gtx 750
|
Tên GPU GF108 GM107 Phiên bản GPU GF108-400-A1 GM107-400-A2 Kiến trúc Fermi Maxwell Nhà sản xuất TSMC TSMC Kích thước tiến trình 40 nm 28 nm Bóng bán dẫn 585 million 1,870 million Kích thước chết 116 mm² 148 mm² Show
Card đồ hoạNgày phát hành Jun 18th, 2014 Feb 18th, 2014 Thế hệ GeForce 700 GeForce 700 Sản xuất End-of-life End-of-life Giao diện Bus PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16 Tiền nhiệm GeForce 600 GeForce 600 Kế vị GeForce 900 GeForce 900 Giá ra mắt — 149 USD Đánh giá — 69 in our database Tốc độ xung nhịpXung nhịp GPU 700 MHz — Xung nhịp đổ bóng 1400 MHz — xung nhịp bộ nhớ 800 MHz 1600 Mbps effective 1350 MHz 5.4 Gbps effective Xung nhịp cơ bản — 1020 MHz Tăng xung nhịp — 1085 MHz Kích thước bộ nhớ 2 GB 2 GB Loại bộ nhớ DDR3 GDDR5 Bộ nhớ Bus 128 bit 128 bit Băng thông 25.60 GB/s 86.40 GB/s cấu hình kết xuấtCác đơn vị bóng 96 640 Đơn vị xử lý bề mặt 16 40 ROPs 4 16 Số lượng SM 2 — Bộ nhớ đệm L1 64 KB (per SM) 64 KB (per SMM) Bộ nhớ đệm L2 256 KB 2 MB Số lượng SMM — 5 Hiệu năng lý thuyếtTỷ lệ điểm ảnh 2.800 GPixel/s 17.36 GPixel/s Tốc độ làm đầy vật liệu 11.20 GTexel/s 43.40 GTexel/s FP32 (float) hiệu năng 268.8 GFLOPS 1,389 GFLOPS FP64 (double) hiệu năng 22.40 GFLOPS (1:12) 43.40 GFLOPS (1:32) Thiết kế bảng mạchChiều rộng khe Single-slot Single-slot Chiều dài 145 mm 5.7 inches 145 mm 5.7 inches Công suất thiết kế 49 W 60 W Bộ nguồn khuyến nghị 200 W 250 W Đầu ra 1x DVI1x HDMI1x VGA 2x DVI1x mini-HDMI Đầu nối nguồn None None Số bảng mạch P1070, P1071 P2010 SKU 50 Tính năng đồ hoạDirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (11_0) OpenGL 4.6 4.6 OpenCL 1.1 3.0 Vulkan — 1.1 CUDA 2.1 5.0 Mô hình đổ bóng 5.1 5.1 GeForce GT 730 vs GeForce GTX 750: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters. ASUS GT730-4H-SL-2GD5//GT730 HDMI 2G GT730-4H-SL-2GD5, GeForce, W126476662 (2G GT730-4H-SL-2GD5, GeForce GT 730, 2 GB, GDDR5, 5010 MHz, 3840 x 2160 Pixels, PCI Express 2.0) Buy on Amazon $119.99 In Stock Same as Founder's Edition QTHREE Geforce GT 730 2G Graphics Card,DDR3,128-bit,HDMI,DVI,VGA,PC Video Card,Computer GPU, PCI Express x16, 2K Support, DirectX 11,Low Profile Buy on Amazon $59.99 In Stock Same as Founder's Edition Key DifferencesIn short — GeForce GTX 750 outperforms GeForce GT 730 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 750 is 120 days older than GeForce GT 730. Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
This is a free version of Borderlands 3. Borderlands 3TOP 5 GamesTheoretical PerformanceNVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Jun 18th, 2014 Release DateFeb 18th, 2014GeForce 700GenerationGeForce 700Not AvailableMSRP$1191x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAOutputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINonePower ConnectorsNone Desktop Segment Desktop 1 GBMemory1 GBDDR3TypeGDDR5128-bitBus128-bit28.8 GB/sBandwidth 80.19 GB/s 700 MHzBase Clock Speed 1020 MHz Not AvailableBoost Clock Speed1085 MHz900 MHzMemory Clock Speed 1253 MHz Builds Using GeForce GT 730 or GeForce GTX 750Borderlands 3, 1920 x 1080, Badass GeForce GT 730 Ryzen 5 3600 8 GB, 240 GB SSD GeForce GT 730 Ryzen 5 3600 8 GB, 240 GB SSD Similar GPU ComparisonsSelect from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Pipelines / CUDA cores51296CUDA cores512no dataCore clock speed1020 MHz700 MHzBoost clock speed1085 MHzno dataNumber of transistors1,870 million585 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm40 nmPower consumption (TDP)55 Watt49 WattMaximum GPU temperature95 °Cno dataTexture fill rate34.7211.2 GT/sFloating-point performance1,111 gflops268.8 gflops Size and compatibilityInformation on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no dataInterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16Length5.7" (14.5 cm)145 mmHeight4.376" (11.1 cm)no dataWidth2-slot1-slotSupplementary power connectorsNoneNone MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5DDR3Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GBMemory bus width128 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed5.0 GB/s1800 MHzMemory bandwidth80 GB/s25.6 GB/s Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAMulti monitor support3 displaysno dataHDMI++HDCP+no dataMaximum VGA resolution2048x1536no dataAudio input for HDMIInternalno data TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. Blu Ray 3D+no data3D Gaming+no data3D Vision+no data3D Vision Live+no data API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)Shader Model5.15.1OpenGL4.44.6OpenCL1.21.1Vulkan1.1.126N/ACUDA+2.1 Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. GTX 750 outperforms GT 730 by 304% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% GTX 750 outperforms GT 730 by 305% in Passmark. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% GTX 750 outperforms GT 730 by 239% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. GeekBench 5 OpenCLGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% GTX 750 outperforms GT 730 by 229% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL. GeekBench 5 VulkanGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% GTX 750 outperforms GT 730 by 171% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan. GeekBench 5 CUDAGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 4% GTX 750 outperforms GT 730 by 290% in GeekBench 5 CUDA. Octane Render OctaneBenchThis is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists. Benchmark coverage: 4% GTX 750 outperforms GT 730 by 180% in Octane Render OctaneBench. Mining hashratesCryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 750 and GeForce GT 730. Usually measured in megahashes per second. Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 143 Mh/s 35 Mh/s Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) no data 1 Mh/s Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 8.65 2.14 Recency 18 February 2014 18 June 2014 Cost $119 $59.99 Pipelines / CUDA cores 512 96 Memory bandwidth 80 25.6 Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 49 Watt The GeForce GTX 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 730 in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce GTX 750 GeForce GT 730 Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
