What is the difference between internal and external failure costs with respect to quality?
|
An important basis for justifying TQM practice is understanding its impact on total quality costs. TQM is rooted in the belief that preventing defects is cheaper than dealing with the costs of quality failures. In other words, total quality costs are minimized when managers strive to reach zero defects in the organization. The four major types of quality costs are prevention, appraisal, internal failure, and external failure. Show
Prevention costs are the costs created from the effort to reduce poor quality. Examples are designing the products so that they will be durable, training employees so they do a good job, certifying suppliers to ensure that suppliers provide quality in products and services, conducting preventive maintenance on equipment, and documenting quality procedures and improvements. In a traditional organization that does not practice TQM, prevention costs typically comprise the smallest percentage of total quality costs. Appraisal costs are a second major type of quality cost. Appraisal costs include the inspection and testing of raw materials, work-in-process, and finished goods. In addition, quality audits, sampling, and statistical process control also fall under the umbrella of appraisal costs. Inspection and testing of raw materials is very important, since substandard raw materials lead to substandard products. Raw materials used for a bridge determine the strength of the bridge. For example, soft steel will erode away faster than hardened steel. Moreover, the concrete bridge decking needs to be solid, as concrete with air pockets will erode and crumble faster creating an unsafe bridge. Internal failure costs are a third category of quality costs. This cost occurs when quality defects are discovered before they reach the customer. Examples of internal failure costs include scrapping a product, reworking the product, and lost productivity due to machine breakdowns or labor errors. Internal failure costs are typically more expensive than both prevention and appraisal costs because a great deal of material and labor often has been invested prior to the discovery of the defect. External failure costs are the fourth major cost of quality. External failure costs when the defect is discovered after it has reached the customer. This is the most expensive category of quality costs. Examples include product returns, repairs, warranty claims, lost reputation, and lost business. One spectacular example of external failure cost was when the Hubble telescope was launched into space with mirrors that were ground improperly. When the telescope was turned on, instead of a magnificent view of stars, planets, and galaxies, the scientists could see only blurred images. The price of correcting the problem was over USD 1 billion. Determinants of Product Quality – Successful
management of quality requires that managers have insights on various aspects of quality. These include defining quality in operational terms, understanding the costs and benefits of quality, recognizing the consequences of poor quality and recognizing the need for ethical behavior. Determinants of Service Quality (Servqual) – Service quality is a business administration term used to describe achievement in service. It reflects at each service encounter. Customers form service expectations from past experiences, word of mouth and advertisement. In general Customers compare perceived service with expected service in which if the former falls short of the latter the customers are disappointed. Consequences of Poor Quality (Cost of poor Quality) – There are numerous consequences with poor quality products which can affect a business and a customer in many different ways. Whether it is a small or large problem, the magnitude of the problem always affects someone at some point. When a product is designed poorly or lacks in quality, customers recognize that very quickly, and it can quickly lead to a problem for the business. It does not matter whether the company is a product or a service oriented company because poor quality will always, most likely, create negative affects for the firm. Eventually, the low cost input in the R&D department and the using cheaper materials will lead to loss of business . Therefore, due to the cost associated with satisfying the customer, it is best to fix problems in the design phase rather than dealing with it after it’s in the hands of a customer. The sooner the problem with a product or service is identified and remedied, the better! To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:
Vincent K. Omachonu (Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA) Sakesun Suthummanon (Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering,
University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA) Norman G. Einspruch (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA) This paper examines the components of quality cost (internal failure, external failure, appraisal cost, and prevention cost) in the context of two key manufacturing inputs, materials and machines; the concept is also explained for the company as a whole. The purpose of this research is to analyze the variables that impact quality in a manufacturing environment. There are three major findings in this
research. First, there is an inverse relationship between appraisal cost plus prevention cost and failure cost. Second, the relationship between appraisal cost plus prevention cost and quality is positive. Finally, failure cost is negatively correlated with quality. This analysis also revealed a strong relationship between appraisal cost plus prevention cost and quality for material input, machine input, and the company. The results indicate that as the appraisal cost plus the prevention cost
increases, quality improves and failure cost decreases.
Omachonu, V.K., Suthummanon, S. and Einspruch, N.G. (2004), "The relationship between
quality and quality cost for a manufacturing company", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 277-290. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710410522720 Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2004, Emerald Group Publishing Limited Related articlesWhat are the external failure costs of quality?External failure cost is one of the three types of cost of quality. It includes the cost a company incurs after a defective product or service reaches the customer and it malfunctions. Two common examples of this cost are warranty cost, cost of the return, and cost of return and replacement.
What are the different costs that are involved under the cost of quality?The Cost of Quality consists of four categories such as Prevention Cost, Appraisal Cost, Internal Failure, and External Failure.
Are internal or external failure costs more expensive?External failure costs tend to be substantially higher than internal failure costs, so it makes sense for a manufacturer to expend more effort to ensure that all products leaving the factory adhere to its quality standards.
What are the internal failure costs?What are Internal Failure Costs? Internal failure costs are those costs of quality associated with product failures that are discovered before a product leaves the factory. These failures are discovered through the firm's internal inspection processes.
|
