Chức năng super sync của flash yn622 là gì
|
Sorry, we just need to make sure you're not a robot. For best results, please make sure your browser is accepting cookies. Type the characters you see in this image:Try different image Conditions of Use Privacy Policy © 1996-2014, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates Sorry, we just need to make sure you're not a robot. For best results, please make sure your browser is accepting cookies. Type the characters you see in this image:Try different image Conditions of Use Privacy Policy © 1996-2014, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates The correct word for the YN-622 is "supersync", not the property-rights-protected "Hypersync". They are not actually the same - supersync has no user-adjustable timing. HSS (Canon high speed sync) is a technology using "flat light" - a small (50KHz) ripple on a base voltage to keep refreshing the Xenon tube which doesn't respond well to a constant DC power supply. Both HSS and Supersync require a pre-shutter trigger which the camera originates. Originally posted ages ago. (permalink) SeedyBee2008 edited this topic ages ago. josh.r says:gotcha ages ago(permalink) mmuetst says:Then we use Super Sync, who cares.....I don´t want to use a property-right-protected word from a company who makes worst products. Originally posted ages ago. (permalink) mmuetst edited this topic ages ago. camcleat says:"a company who makes worst products." Wow. You've made claims like that in several threads. What exactly makes PocketWizards 'the worst products?' Do you some reliability data to support that statement? Or, maybe some customer satisfaction stats? ages ago(permalink) josh.r says:when you use the wrong word to describe something it can be confusing. I genuinely posted what I did to get a better understanding of what you were talking about. It's not about it being a proprietary technology, which it is, but it's about it being a different technology to what you are talking about. Yes hypersync does in some ways work the way you think but there is more to it. As for PW making the worst product that seems like a dubious claim to say the least. ages ago(permalink) aka_ituner says:All products PW should not be called bad, but PW TT1/TT5 system for Canon, brought a lot of serious trouble to users. It's not worth denying. On the topic. I do not understand why use supersync with flash, which has HSS and with flashes that have IGBT power divider?. This is highly inefficient in practice. Supersync applies only to traditional flashes, having a long duration of the flash. (from t.5 = 1/900s or longer) In addition, 5DmkII has big delay before the shutter, so you could not get a clean frame in the Supersync mode with 580EXII. On faster cameras this problem is not observed. ages ago(permalink) mmuetst says:My choice words was not wise, but I think that Pocket wizard is losing there position in radio trigger market by using the low radio frequency. The TT1 and TT5 is a very expensive system which has some serious problems, like black bars on 1/100 shutterspeed (I see some posts on forums from owners with this problem), problems with RF when using the Canon 580EX II, bad battery choice for the TT1, no LCD display like de Phottix Odin, Extra AC3 when you want to control groups. I know In the past, the only choice was Pocket Wizard for radio TTL (and Radiopoppers, but you cannot buy that brand in the Netherlands). But now there are more players on the market making better stuf. aka_ituner, I used the Nissin DI866MKII and my Canon 580EX II only to test the Super Sync function to see how it is working. I do not own studio flashes anymore (I did owned some in the past, but I'm working 100% with speedlites now). Originally posted ages ago. (permalink) mmuetst edited this topic ages ago. Jerry P. H. says:mmuetst, what you are talking about takes NO special flashes, it can be done with basically ANY speedlight as long as the trigger responds fast enough, so I don't know what you are trying to say. As far as PW having issues, sure, they had their share. Reverse engineering Nikon and Canon products is not easy and if you think you can do better, you are welcome to start your own trigger company or send in your application to PW, they are always looking for bright people. That said, the PW products to this day are the standard. Are they loosing market share? Yes, only because there are tons of oriental triggers on the market out there. More choices equals a more spread out market share. Can any of those companies today (and I do sincerely mean **any**), do as much as the PW line does? No, not even close. You are repeating age old arguments that just have little to no bearing or new information to the conversation and have been run around here for more than the amount of time they need to be repeated. If you don't like PW products, don't buy them, if you do, buy them... it is no more difficult than that. BTW, the old sync-speed hack that has been around for MANY years now can be done using with quite a few more triggers on the market, but initially nothing else worked other than the PW triggers which can all do this. It is not so much what speedlight can do it (I have done it using most any Nikon, Canon, Sony, etc... speedlight. Besides those I have alos tested Vivitar and even a few 1970's Metz units too and many studio heads all successfully). It is just a combination of having fast responding triggers and a flash of adequately long duration, it is no longer the black magic that it appeared to be 4-6 years ago. So what's with all the bitterness? Time to move on IMHO. ages ago(permalink) mmuetst says:PW is not ¨the standard¨ anymore Phottix Odin is the new standard for e-TTL/i-TTL triggers. Sorry, it is simply better than TT1 and TT5. And the Phottix is there for Sony users. Originally posted ages ago. (permalink) mmuetst edited this topic ages ago. Tim Lovelady says: thanks for posting some VERY useful information, a lot of people like me out there will be reading about the 622 triggers and wondering if they can get super sync with the flash units they already have.Flashes i'd like to see tested: yn-460ii yn-465 yn-565ex Pretty please! ages ago(permalink) Myra Mains says: RebelXTious:565 My YN-565EX synced up to 1/320", black bar thereafter. ages ago(permalink) SeedyBee2008 says:Myra Mains - as the YN565 does not have HSS, it needs to be connected by a cable to the PC-sync port to get supersync. The camera should be in HSS mode. ages ago(permalink) Myra Mains says: SeedyBee2008:It syncs to 1/320 when plugged into the PC port and when mounted on the 622 hotshoe. The only difference is that when using the PC port, the bar is on the top (and fuzzy,) and when using the hotshoe the bar is on the bottom. ages ago(permalink) SeedyBee2008 says:Myra Mains - which camera are you using? An EOS 2007 or later? Are you connecting the PC-sync cable to the remote YN-622C, not the on-camera 622 or the camera itself? You may find "The Other YN-622C User Guide" of help in getting a better result: docs.google.com/open?id=0B77OmmGIg0gMVFpqNkpBYXBHajA ages ago(permalink) Myra Mains says: SeedyBee2008:I'm using a Canon 40D, plugging the 565 into the PC port of the remote receiver. ages ago(permalink) Jerry P. H. says:mmuetst says: PW is not ¨the standard¨ anymore Phottix Odin is the new standard for e-TTL/i-TTL triggers. Sorry, it is simply better than TT1 and TT5. And the Phottix is there for Sony users. ----- Is it now? Have any proof? How about some conclusive numbers? So what if Photix has a trigger for Sony, that is only 10-15% of the market, as per Nikon and Canon sales numbers. No reason for PW to spend a ton of time and effort for an aspect that is such a minor sales percentage in the overall market. As for how the Photix Odin is better than that PW... HOW? - Does the Photix Odin have adjustable "supersync? - Can the Photix control the output power of Alien Bee and Elinchrom lights? - Can the Photix Odin triger **all** previous Photix products? - Does the Photix do SpeedCycle? - Does the Photix provide PowerTracking? - Does the Photix provide modering light Autotracking? - Does the Odin reduce preflashes to reduce battery drain and recycle times? - Does the Odin have any light meter companies out there that can trigger it or control power output of all supported light sources? - Does the Photix provide Remote TTL Flash sleep mode control? - When you call support at Photix, do you even get someone that speaks English? Oh wait... there *is no* support for Photix in North America! You have to go to Hong Kong, or deal with some retailer, not someone that KNOWS how to find and address any potentential issues.. How about talking build quality? Another PW win. How long as Photix even existed? Oh, 2-3 years huh? LPA has been around since the 1990's and they are the ones that created this industry! If someone gave you a HUGE shoot session tomorrow, and the airlines lost your Odins, can you go to near any photo rental place and rent an Odin? I just checked... and the answer is... not surprisingly... no. No problem getting anything PW related near anywhere. How about design quality? Can you change the power of the flashes without taking your eye off the view finder? No, huh? Another PW advantage. These are just a couple of things that I can say off the top of my head, and I am sure that I can provide more examples. I think that your definiteion of the word "better" and everyone else's... are worlds apart. I think that perhaps the only time you would dare use the word better is *maybe* that the Photix are a better trigger FOR YOU... but feature for feature, Photix is not likely going to ever be better than the ControlTL units. |
