Đánh giá sigma 85 non art năm 2024
|
I don't have the 85 non-art. But I tried the 50mm Sigma and Canon. The Canon just wasn't as good as it should be, and I didn't like the longitudinal chromatic aberration of the Sigma. An accquaintance warned me of chromatic aberration of the Canon 85/1.8 and wasn't that fond of it. So it might turn out that you don't really have many choices for a very fast lens in the price bracket and have to go with the Sigma anyway. But personally I would go with the Tamron 85/1.8 VC rather than struggle with critical focus at f1.4 . Being able to swan about taking shots with an 85mm at 1/20s... Re: Sigma 85mm f1.4 ex dg non art I would highly recommend the Sigma 85 EX. It is my number one lens for years now. Extremely sharp even when wide open (although I did have to use my in-body AF fine tuning). Most of the photos (~90% -- i.e. not the macro or wide shots) in my portfolio (http://clients.jhorstphotography.com/gallery.php?tag=78) are shot with the 85 EX. My only complaint is that the CA's can be a bit much when wide open and in a high contrast area. Nikon D800 Nikon D850 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm F4G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Tamron SP AF 90mm F/2.8 Di Macro +6 more OP Eagle430s • Regular Member • Posts: 371 Re: Sigma 85mm f1.4 ex dg non art I ve read very good reviews about this lens and its half the price of the 85mm art How is this lens at f2.5-2.8? Is the ca better? Re: Sigma 85mm f1.4 ex dg non art Eagle430s wrote: I ve read very good reviews about this lens and its half the price of the 85mm art How is this lens at f2.5-2.8? Is the ca better? Mine is very sharp in that range and the CAs usually aren't an issue (between shooting conditions and software, it's virtually non existent). Nikon D800 Nikon D850 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm F4G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Tamron SP AF 90mm F/2.8 Di Macro +6 more UGPRO • Contributing Member • Posts: 615 Re: Sigma 85mm f1.4 ex dg non art 1 Eagle430s wrote: I am looking for a prime lens for my canon 6d I will use it mostly outdoors for fashion for beautiful background blur What are your opinions about this lens? How is the iq and sharpness of this lens?(not the art version) Also i will be using wide apertures between f 2.0-2.8-3.2 is it sharp at these wide apertures? I was also thinking about a 50mm f1.4 lens but i think the 85mm will give me better background blur and also i read a few reviews that the 85mm sigma is sharper and better in iq than both the sigma 50mm and canon 50mm f1.4 Its my go to lens for portraits. Almost always shoot at 1.8 or 2. Bitingly sharp Closed down a couple of stops or at 5.6 it give a huge file size. In fact this is the only lens among my other lenses that gives such a file size. captures very very detailed/clear/contrasty image stepped down. I don't have AF issues with it. Focuses perfectly. Very low CA at 1.4 and 1.8, but very minimal can be ignored or corrected if required. I didn't find any CA above 2.8. I didn't get a chance to compare it with the Art series. Probably others can comment on it. Nikon D700 Nikon D810 Nikon AF Nikkor 85mm f/1.8D Nikon AF Nikkor 180mm f/2.8D ED-IF Sigma 50mm F1.4 EX DG HSM +8 more (unknown member) • Forum Pro • Posts: 11,356 Re: Sigma 85mm f1.4 ex dg non art 1 The lens is extremely sharp and that is why I am not upgrading to the ART version. I don't have any problem with focusing. Very little CA which can be easily corrected. Here is 100% crop. Only 800k from 36mp so only 2.5 % of the full picture. If you zoom in on the eye on the right you will see a little CA. But this is a humongous crop so I did not even bothered to correct it. -- hide signature -- If I don't respond to your post after you responded to my with NEGATIVE remarks that means you are on my Ignore list. Photography Director for Whedonopolis.com Keyboard shortcuts: FForum MMy threads You may also likeLatest sample galleriesLatest in-depth reviewsThe Nikon Zf is a 24MP full-frame mirrorless camera with classic looks that adds the latest Expeed 7 processor and features such as 3D Tracking AF to the $2000 price bracket. We're not sure the experience lives up to the looks. The Sony a9 III is the world's first full-frame mirrorless camera to feature a global electronic shutter with simultaneous readout. We've been using a full production version of this 120 fps sports camera, to see what you gain (and, perhaps, lose). The Aura Carver 10.1" HD Digital Frame is a great way to put your portfolio on display and a great way to surface forgotten memories. The colors are vibrant, and the build quality is solid, but the Carver isn't without a few quirks. With a bigger battery and better video capabilities, the Fujifilm X-S20 could be the vlogging machine content creators have been waiting for. The Sony a7CR is a high-resolution addition to the company's compact full-frame a7C series. So what did we make of it and where does it leave the a7 IV that it sits just above? Latest buying guidesIf you want a compact camera that produces great quality photos without the hassle of changing lenses, there are plenty of choices available for every budget. Read on to find out which portable enthusiast compacts are our favorites. What's the best camera for travel? Good travel cameras should be small, versatile, and offer good image quality. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for travel and recommended the best. 'What's the best mirrorless camera?' We're glad you asked. What’s the best camera for around $2000? This price point gives you access to some of the most all-round capable cameras available. Excellent image quality, powerful autofocus and great looking video are the least you can expect. We've picked the models that really stand out. Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. |
