How do you find the width and height of an image in html?
❮ HTML ExampleAn image with a height of 600 pixels and a width of 500 pixels: Try it Yourself » The Tip: Always specify both the Tip: Downsizing a large image with the Browser Support
SyntaxAttribute Values
❮ HTML
The width and height attributes of the IMG element specifies the width and height of an image.
ExampleSample image (width:193px, height:130px) Output (width:193px, height:130px) (width:96px, height:65px) (width:100%, height:130px)
width and height attributes on your images to prevent layout shifts and improve the experience of your site visitors.Web performance advocates have often advised to add dimensions to your images for best performance to allow the page to be laid out with the appropriate space for the image, before the image itself has been downloaded. This avoids a layout shift as the image is downloaded — something Chrome has recently started measuring in the new Cumulative Layout Shift metric. Well, a dirty, little, secret — not that well-known outside the hard-core web performance advocates — is that, until recently, this actually didn’t make a difference in a lot of cases, as we’ll see below. However, adding Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit… This might render in two stages, first as the HTML is downloaded, and then second once the image is downloaded. With the above code, this would cause the main content to jump down after the image is downloaded and the space needed to display it can be calculated: Layout shift after image loads. (Large preview)Layout shifts are very disrupting to the user, especially if you have already started reading the article and suddenly you are thrown off by a jolt of movement, and you have to find your place again. This also puts extra work on the browser to recalculate the page layout as each image arrives across the internet. On a complex page with a lot of images this can place a considerable load on the device at a time when it’s probably got a lot of better things to deal with! The traditional way to avoid this was to provide Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur… Then the render happens like below, where the appropriate amount of space is set aside for the image when it arrives, and there is no jarring shift of the text as the image is downloaded: Text should not shift if image dimensions are provided so appropriate space can be allocated. (Large preview)Even ignoring the annoying impact to the user in content jumping around (which you shouldn’t!), the impact on the CPU can also be quite substantial. The below screenshot shows the performance calculations performed by Chrome on a site I work on
which has a gallery of about 100 images. The left-hand side shows the calculations when As you can see, the impact is considerable — especially on lower-end devices and slow network speed, where images are coming in separately. This increases load time by a noticeable amount. How CSS Interacts With Element Widths And HeightsWidths and heights on an image can cause issues when you try to alter them using CSS. For example, if you want to limit your images to a certain width you might use the following CSS:
This will override the This is actually very easily fixed by adding a
However, I find it still catches people by surprise and sometimes leads to them not specifying image
dimensions in the HTML instead. With no image dimensions, you can get away with just specifying So, once we add the dimensions and that the For example, take the code below:
This would have resulted in this load: Layout shifts happen whenheight: auto is used in CSS.
(Large preview)Wait, what’s going on here? We’re back to the first problem. I thought I said that by specifying the image dimensions in the HTML you could avoid this layout shift problem? Well, this is where it gets interesting and will lead on to the main point of this article. The problem is that, unless you were giving explicit The implication of all this is that specifying
This affects any page where we constrain the image size in a responsive manner — i.e. small screen mobile devices. These are likely to be the very users suffering with network constraints and limited processing power that will suffer most from layout shifts! Of course, we ideally should be delivering appropriately sized images for the screen size, but you cannot cover every device size, so often images will need some resizing by the browser, particularly on mobile. Many websites may not bother to specify Rather than hard-coding the If Basically, this solution means if the following four conditions are true, then the correct image dimensions could be calculated without needing to wait for the images to download, and so without the need of a content layout shift:
If any one of these were not set, then the calculation would not be possible, and so would fail and be ignored and have to wait for the image to be downloaded. So once browsers support using the HTML Driving Adoption Of This SolutionBecause this is just a CSS attribute, the proposal contained a further twist — it could be added to the user-agent stylesheet used by browsers so would not even require any changes from web developers to benefit from this. The user-agent stylesheet is where default CSS definitions are set (e.g. what However,
this does depend on the Firefox went ahead and did this as an experiment and then turned it on by default for Firefox 71. Once that was released, then your site may well have just got faster for free — thanks Mozilla! Maybe in future, they will move this to the user-agent stylesheet method, but for now, this is sufficient (and perhaps more performant?). Backwards CompatibilityWhen introducing a change in behavior, there is always a concern about backwards compatibility and this feature was no different. In theory, as long as the four attributes were appropriately set, there should be no breakage with this. However, when Firefox initially
experimented with it, they discovered problems for those setting the The solution to that problem, however, was relatively simple: have the actual image aspect-ratio of the image override any CSS calculated aspect-ratio. This way the (incorrectly) calculated aspect-ratio can be used for initial layout, but then can be recalculated when the image is downloaded, so the image is displayed as it was before. This does cause a layout shift (since the incorrect space was allocated initially) but that was happening before anyway, so it’s no worse. In fact, it’s often a lot better as an incorrect aspect ratio will often be closer to the truth than a zero aspect-ratio. Rollout To Other BrowsersAfter Firefox’s successful experimentation, Chrome also decided to implement this (again using the layout coded method for now rather than default user-agent stylesheet), and rolled it out by default in Chrome 79. This also took care of the other chromium-based browsers (Edge, Opera and Brave, for example). More recently, in January 2020, Apple added it to their Tech Preview edition of Safari, meaning it should hopefully be coming to the production version of Safari soon, and with that, the last of the major browsers will have implemented this and the web will become better and less jolty for a huge number of sites. LimitationsThere are a few limitations to be aware of with this feature, including issues with:
Art DirectionThe fix works great to calculate the aspect-ratio based on a fixed In this case we are using a wide image for desktop, and then a square, cropped image for mobile. Responsive images can be implemented with the
Currently, this only allows the Perfect! Well, unfortunately, I discovered this height and width solution is not compatible with the recently released native lazy-loading functionality as can be seen on this test page. I’ve raised a bug for this issue and hopefully the Chrome team will fix this soon. (Update: This was fixed in Chrome 83.) Non-ImagesCurrently, the browsers that have implemented this, have only done for the How do you write the width and height of an image in HTML?The height and width of an image can be set using height and width attribute. The height and width can be set in terms of pixels. The height attribute is used to set the height of the image in pixels. The width attribute is used to set the width of the image in pixels.
How do you check the size of an image in HTML?The width attribute specifies the width of an image, in pixels. Tip: Always specify both the height and width attributes for images. If height and width are set, the space required for the image is reserved when the page is loaded.
How do you find the width and height in HTML?CSS height and width Examples. Set the height and width of a element: div { height: 200px; width: 50%; ... . Set the height and width of another
element: div { height: 100px; width: 500px; ... . This
element has a height of 100 pixels and a max-width of 500 pixels: div { max-width: 500px; height: 100px;. How do I manage the size of an image in HTML?Step 1: Firstly, we have to type the Html code in any text editor or open the existing Html file in the text editor in which we want to change the size of an image. Step 2: Now, place the cursor inside the img tag. And then, we have to use the height and width attribute of the img tag for changing the size of an image.
|