Many studies that assess secure and insecure attachment in adolescence use the

Effect of a parenting intervention on decreasing adolescents’ behavioral problems via reduction in attachment insecurity: A longitudinal, multicenter, randomized controlled trial

Author links open overlay panelLaviniaBaroneaPerson1EnvelopeNicolaCaronea1AntonellaCostantinobJenniferGenschowbSaraMerellibAnnaritaMilonecLisaPolidoricLauraRuglionicMarlene M.Morettid

Show
Show moreNavigate Down

ShareShare

Cited ByCite

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.07.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Introduction

Secure attachment in adolescence, related to caregiving quality, is a robust predictor of positive behavioral adjustment in early adulthood and beyond. Nevertheless, few attempts have been made to develop treatments to promote parent–adolescent attachment security.

Methods

Using a longitudinal, multicenter, randomized controlled trial design, two questionnaire-based studies were run in Italy (Study 1: n = 100 mothers of adolescents, 60% boys, Mage = 14.89, SD = 1.58; Study 2: n = 40 mothers and 40 adolescents, 60% boys, Mage = 14.90, SD = 1.91) to test the effectiveness of an attachment-based parenting intervention (i.e., Connect) in reducing adolescents’ behavioral problems and attachment insecurity 2 weeks post-intervention (t2) and at a 4-month follow-up (t3). It was further investigated whether a decrease in avoidant and anxious attachment at t2 would account for changes in externalizing and internalizing problems, respectively, at t3. All adolescents belonged to two-parent intact families.

Results

Mothers who completed Connect reported significantly fewer adolescent behavioral problems and lower adolescent attachment insecurity, compared to mothers in the waitlist group, at both t2 and t3 (Study 1). These findings were confirmed in a second subsample (Study 2), considering both mothers' and adolescents’ reports. Controlling for pre-intervention behavioral problems, reductions in internalizing and externalizing problems were observed in both studies at t3 via a decrease in anxious and avoidant attachment, respectively, at t2.

Conclusions

The findings point to the malleability of attachment security in adolescence and highlight the importance of targeting parenting quality to promote adolescent behavioral adjustment.

Introduction

Adolescence is a time when vulnerabilities to many adult mental health issues emerge (Hofstra et al., 2000, 2002; Jones, 2013). However, rapid neurological, cognitive, and social-relational changes during this period offer immense opportunities for growth and adaptation (Kroger et al., 2010; Sercombe, 2014). In particular, social learning develops rapidly between the ages of 12 and 16, whereby structural changes in the “social brain network” sensitize adolescents to engage with and attend to others in new ways, corresponding to a rise in social understanding (Crone & Dahl, 2012; Wölfer et al., 2012). In short, the adolescent brain could not be more perfectly designed to ensure maximal fit with ever-changing social contexts (Crone & Dahl, 2012).

Attachment theory provides a comprehensive framework for understanding adolescents' mental health in the context of the parent–child relationship (Allen & Tan, 2016; Bowlby, 1969; Brumariu & Kerns, 2010; Groh et al., 2017; Kerns & Brumariu, 2014). Adolescents, in fact, fare much better when they can rely on their parents for the provision of a safe haven and secure base (Kobak et al., 2007; McElhaney et al., 2009) as they explore social roles outside the family and develop attachment relationships with peers and romantic partners (Allen & Tan, 2016). Conflict in the parent–adolescent relationship is also normative, but the ways in which the dyad negotiates this conflict and sustains the relationship have critical implications for the adolescent's healthy development (Branje, 2018; Moretti & Holland, 2003). Adolescents who feel their relationship with their parents is secure, despite conflict, confidently move forward toward early adulthood (Allen & Tan, 2016). These securely attached adolescents do not avoid conflict, exploration, or individuation, nor do they prematurely push to independence without their parents' support (Feeney & Cassidy, 2003; Moretti & Holland, 2003).

Secure attachment and emotional connectedness with parents, however, may be difficult to maintain. Adolescents sometimes express their needs in ways that confuse their parents; parents, in turn, may respond using strategies that are no longer effective now that their child is older (Moretti et al., 2018). As adolescents push for autonomy, parents may experience caregiving as increasingly difficult (Spring et al., 2002). As a result, they may become stressed and try to control their adolescent child using coercive and aggressive strategies, and this may damage the parent–adolescent relationship and intensify any social-emotional and behavioral difficulties that the adolescent may have. Alternatively, parents may experience their adolescent's push for autonomy as deeply rejecting, and consequently pull away from their child (Moretti et al., 2018).

How can parents be helped in supporting their offspring through this challenging developmental transition? Although most attachment-based parenting interventions have been developed for mothers of infants or young children (Bakermans-Kranenburg et al., 2003), there has recently been increased interest in attachment-based parenting interventions for parents of adolescents (Kobak & Kerig, 2015). There are two main reasons for this: first, attachment security has been shown to be a robust predictor of adolescent positive adjustment in early adulthood and beyond (Allen & Tan, 2016; Bowlby, 1969); and second, adolescent attachment has been found to be relatively fluid and meaningfully related to changes in the quality of caregiving, even among adolescents who were insecurely attached to their parents in infancy (Beijersbergen et al., 2012; Booth-LaForce et al., 2014).

In contrast to attachment-based interventions for parents of young children, which aim at changing parents' internal working models and increasing parental sensitivity to children's attachment needs (Bakermans-Kranenburg et al., 2003), attachment-based parenting interventions for parents of adolescents emphasize adolescents' active role in maintaining the attachment bond as a goal-corrected partnership (Allen & Tan, 2016). Some attachment-based interventions for adolescents already exist. For instance, the attachment-based family therapy (ABFT; Diamond, 2014) has been found to be effective in strengthening family cohesion and thereby buffering against adolescents' suicidal thinking, depression, and risk behaviors (Diamond, 2014); furthermore, the Adolescent Mentalization-Based Integrative Treatment (AMBIT; Bevington et al., 2015) has been shown to support caseworkers in forming a relationship with difficult-to-reach adolescents through the cultivation of mentalization (Bevington et al., 2015). Notwithstanding these developments, Kobak and Kerig (2015) recently called attention to the need to provide parents of adolescents with an alternative and positive model of attachment that might alter their interpretations of and responses to their adolescent child's problematic behaviors.

Based on these premises, Moretti et al. (2009) developed Connect—a 10-week manualized parenting program for parents or alternative caregivers of pre-adolescents and adolescents with behavioral problems. In contrast to other attachment-based interventions, which mainly target a single aspect of parenting, Connect addresses four aspects of parenting linked with attachment security in adolescence (i.e., caregiver sensitivity, reflective functioning, dyadic affect regulation, shared partnership/mutuality) to support adolescents in taking developmentally appropriate steps toward autonomy while remaining emotionally connected to their parents (Moretti et al., 2018).

Compared to social learning theory–based behavioral programs for parents of younger children (e.g., Comet, Incredible Years), Connect has been found to be particularly effective in reducing child externalizing behaviors, both post-intervention and at a 2-year follow-up (Högström et al., 2017). Furthermore, previous research from different countries (i.e., Canada, Italy, Sweden) has shown significant improvements post-intervention corresponding to medium-to-large effect sizes in a number of domains for adolescents with pre-intervention levels of externalizing symptoms in clinical and sub-clinical ranges, as reported by parents; these results have been consistent, irrespective of adolescent gender (Moretti et al., 2015, Moretti et al., 2018). Upon completing Connect, parents have reported reduced adolescent oppositional, aggressive, and antisocial behavior (Barone et al., 2020; Osman et al., 2017a; Ozturk et al., 2019), as well as reduced anxiety and depression, compared to a waitlist group (Barone et al., 2020; Moretti & Obsuth, 2009; Osman et al., 2017b); increased parenting satisfaction and efficacy (Moretti & Obsuth, 2009; Osman et al., 2017b); decreased parenting stress (Ozturk et al., 2019); decreased adolescent overuse of wine and beer (Giannotta et al., 2013); and a shift in parenting representations toward greater mutuality, positivity, and security (Moretti et al., 2012).

In addition to offering these promising results, Connect also lays the groundwork for research into the relationship between adolescent attachment insecurity and adolescent behavioral problems. Several studies have indicated that, over the course of development, individuals with anxious attachment have a higher risk of developing internalizing symptoms (Carlson & Sroufe, 1995; Colonnesi et al., 2011; Dagan et al., 2018, 2020; Finnegan et al., 1996; Hodges et al., 1999), while those with avoidant attachment are at greater risk of developing externalizing symptoms (Bakermans-Kranerburg & van IJzendoorn, 2009; Kobak & Cole, 1994). However, studies have produced conflicting results about the precise forms of insecure attachment associated with specific behavioral problems (Brumariu & Kerns, 2010; Groh et al., 2012; Kerns & Brumariu, 2014; Madigan et al., 2013). In a similar vein, Moretti et al. (2015) found that parental participation in Connect reduced adolescent avoidant and anxious attachment, which were associated with decreased externalizing and internalizing symptoms, respectively. However, the study relied exclusively on parents’ reports of adolescent functioning, did not use a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design, lacked a control group, and measured both behavioral problems and attachment only pre- and post-treatment. Therefore, the treatment outcomes require further investigation.

The present paper reports two experimental studies (Study 1, using mothers' reports only; Study 2, using a subsample of mothers' and adolescents’ reports) using a longitudinal, multicenter, RCT design with three assessment points: pre-intervention (t1), 2 weeks post-intervention (t2), and a 4-month follow-up (t3). The following hypotheses were tested:

1.

The Connect mother group would report a decrease in adolescent avoidant and anxious attachment and internalizing and externalizing problems, relative to the waitlist control mother group, at t2 and t3.

2.

Mothers in the Connect parent group would report a decrease in adolescent attachment avoidance and anxiety at t2, which, in turn, would be associated with reduced externalizing problems and internalizing problems, respectively, at t3.

Section snippets

Participants

The sample comprised 100 mothers with adolescent children (60 male; 40 female) mean aged 14.89 years (SD = 1.58; age range: 12–18 years), living in Italy and belonging to two-parent intact families. The majority of mothers were Italian (89%) and employed (87%). Mothers were randomly assigned to the (Connect) intervention (n = 50 mothers) or the (waitlist) control (n = 50 mothers) group, following simple randomization procedures (computerized random numbers). Table 1 presents the detailed

Preliminary analyses

As displayed in Table 1, no differences were found at t1, with respect to either group or center, regarding mothers' age, education, nationality, working status, participation in a prior psychological support intervention, and number of children, or adolescents’ age and gender. Connect and control mothers reported similar levels of adolescent avoidant and anxious attachment and internalizing and externalizing problems at t1. Table 2 shows the associations among the study variables at each time

Participants

Of the 100 mothers from Study 1, in 40 cases questionnaires were also filled out by their adolescent children. This subsample of 40 mothers and their 40 adolescents (n = 80) constituted the participants of Study 2. The attrition rate from t1 to t2 was 11% (Connect group: n = 1 mother, n = 4 adolescents; control group: n = 5 adolescents); and 14% from t1 to t3 (Connect group: n = 1 mother, n = 3 adolescents; control group: n = 1 mother, n = 6 adolescents). Independent samples t-tests revealed no

Effectiveness of Connect in reducing adolescent attachment insecurity and behavioral problems at t2 and t3 (mothers' and adolescents’ reports)

Table 5 displays within mother-adolescent dyad associations of avoidant and anxious attachment, and internalizing and externalizing problems at each time point.When the reports of both mothers and adolescents were considered, the interaction between group and time was significant for both adolescent avoidant (F [2232] = 3.06, p = .049, d = 0.621) and adolescent anxious attachment (F [2195] = 5.45, p = .005, d = 0.995). Simple effects analyses indicated that adolescents’ avoidant and anxious

Discussion

Using a longitudinal, multicenter, RCT design, the present research investigated the effectiveness of the attachment-based parenting intervention Connect (Moretti et al., 2009), in reducing adolescent behavioral problems and attachment insecurity at 2 weeks post-intervention and a 4-month follow-up in two studies. Study 1 used only mothers' reports, whereas Study 2 used both mothers' and adolescents’ reports. The research further investigated whether post-intervention decreases in adolescent

Practical implications and future directions

Adolescence is marked by struggles for autonomy, maintenance of parental attachment (Kobak et al., 2007; McElhaney et al., 2009), and unique neurobiological, cognitive, and social-relational changes (Crone & Dahl, 2012; Sercombe, 2014). Unsurprisingly, under these circumstances, adolescents may not be ready to face their behavioral difficulties alone, and their direct involvement in treatment may be challenging. Furthermore, parents often struggle to find support for the specific difficulties

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participating families. The research was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR, grant no. TVG-115617).

References (65)

  • R. Wölfer et al.

    Embeddedness and empathy: How the social network shapes adolescents' social understanding

    Journal of Adolescence

    (2012)

  • H. Sercombe

    Risk, adaptation and the functional teenage brain

    Brain and Cognition

    (2014)

  • V. Patel et al.

    The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development

    The Lancet

    (2018)

  • M.M. Moretti et al.

    Effectiveness of an attachment-focused manualized intervention for parents and teens at risk for aggressive behaviors: The Connect program

    Journal of Adolescence

    (2009)

  • J. Kroger et al.

    Identity status change during adolescence and young adulthood: A meta-analysis

    Journal of Adolescence

    (2010)

  • M.B. Hofstra et al.

    Child and adolescent problems predict DSM-IV disorders in adulthood: A 14-year followup of a Dutch epidemiological sample

    Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

    (2002)

  • M.B. Hofstra et al.

    Continuity and change of psychopathology from childhood into adulthood: A 14-year follow-up study

    Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

    (2000)

  • O. Dagan et al.

    Adult attachment representations and depressive symptoms: A meta-analysis

    Journal of Affective Disorders

    (2018)

  • J.P. Allen et al.

    The multiple facts of attachment in adolescence

  • C.J. Bachmann et al.

    The cost of love: Financial consequences of insecure attachment in antisocial youth

    Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

    (2019)

  • M.J. Bakermans-Kranenburg et al.

    The first 10,000 Adult Attachment Interviews: Distributions of adult attachment representations in clinical and non-clinical groups

    Attachment & Human Development

    (2009)

  • M.J. Bakermans-Kranenburg et al.

    Less is more: meta-analysis of sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood

    Psychological Bulletin

    (2003)

  • L. Barone et al.

    Training parents to adolescents’ challenges: The Connect parent program

    Quaderni di Psicoterapia Cognitiva

    (2020)

  • R.M. Baron et al.

    The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1986)

  • M.D. Beijersbergen et al.

    Remaining or becoming secure: Parental sensitive support predicts attachment continuity from infancy to adolescence in a longitudinal adoption study

    Developmental Psychology

    (2012)

  • D. Bevington et al.

    Applying attachment theory to effective practice with hard-to-reach youth: The AMBIT approach

    Attachment & Human Development

    (2015)

  • K.A. Bollen

    Structural equations with latent variables

    (1989)

  • C. Booth-LaForce et al.

    Caregiving and contextual sources of continuity and change in attachment from infancy to late adolescence

    Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development

    (2014)

  • G. Bosmans et al.

    Attachment in middle childhood: Progress and prospects

    New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development

    (2015)

  • J. Bowlby

    (1969)

  • S. Branje

    Development of parent–adolescent relationships: Conflict interactions as a mechanism of change

    Child Development Perspectives

    (2018)

  • L.E. Brumariu et al.

    Parent–child attachment and internalizing symptoms in childhood and adolescence: A review of empirical findings and future directions

    Development and Psychopathology

    (2010)

  • E.A. Carlson et al.

    Contribution of attachment theory to developmental psychopathology

  • J. Cohen

    Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

    (1988)

  • C. Colonnesi et al.

    The relation between insecure attachment and child anxiety: A meta-analytic study

    Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

    (2011)

  • E.A. Crone et al.

    Understanding adolescence as a period of social–affective engagement and goal flexibility

    Nature Reviews Neuroscience

    (2012)

  • O. Dagan et al.

    Preoccupied and dismissing attachment representations are differentially associated with anxiety in adolescence and adulthood: A meta-analysis

    Clinical Psychological Science

    (2020)

  • M.A. Detry et al.

    Analyzing repeated measurements using mixed models

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (2016)

  • G.M. Diamond

    Attachment-based family therapy interventions

    Psychotherapy

    (2014)

  • B.C. Feeney et al.

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2003)

  • R.A. Finnegan et al.

    Preoccupied and avoidant coping during middle childhood

    Child Development

    (1996)

  • C. George et al.

    Adult attachment Interview

    (1985)

  • Navigate DownView more references

    Cited by (3)

    • Secure Attachment Relationships With Mothers, But Not Fathers, Moderate the Relation Between Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Symptoms and Delinquency in Adolescents

      2023, Journal of Attention Disorders

    • Destructive interparental conflict affects Chinese children’s emotional and behavioral problems: Indirect pathways via parent–child attachment and emotional insecurity

      2022, Frontiers in Psychology

    • Parent Emotion Regulation, Mindful Parenting, and Youth Attachment: Direct and Indirect Associations with Internalizing and Externalizing Problems

      2022, Child Psychiatry and Human Development

    • Research article

      A therapist-guided parent-delivered self-help group for anxiety disorders in children: An effectiveness study

      Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy, Volume 31, Issue 2, 2021, pp. 105-113

      Show abstractNavigate Down

      Standard CBT programs for childhood anxiety are costly. Low-intensity self-help treatments may increase access to evidence-based interventions. These interventions are generally promising. We tested the effectiveness of a therapist-guided parent-delivered self-help group intervention based on the “Cool Kids” program at mid-treatment, post-treatment and 6-months follow-up. We enrolled 117 families with children aged 6–12 years. Effect sizes were calculated for mother, father and child reports. Reliable change and change in clinical status were based on mother and child report. We found a significant decrease in both anxiety and depression symptoms. Effect sizes were medium to large for anxiety symptoms following treatment. Mothers reported that 53.8% of the children obtained a reliable change in anxiety symptoms from pre- to post-treatment, and 66.7% from pre- to follow-up. Out of 72.6% children who were classified as having clinical anxiety prior to treatment, 52.9% and 58.8% changed their status to non-clinical at post-treatment and follow-up, respectively. Clinical significant change, involving having achieved both a reliable change and change of status from clinical to non-clinical, was obtained for 49.4% at post-treatment, and 58.8% at follow-up based on mother reports. Our findings indicate that parent-delivered self-help CBT groups may be a valuable asset in improving access to psychological cost-effective evidence-based treatments for anxious children.

    • Research article

      The associations of maternal/paternal modeling, self-efficacy, and ethnic fit on math/science achievement among Latinx students

      Journal of Adolescence, Volume 92, 2021, pp. 247-257

      Show abstractNavigate Down

      This paper examined individual, family, and peer roles in promoting Latinx youths’ math and science performance. The role of maternal/paternal modeling in education was examined as shaping academic self-efficacy and, in turn, math/science grades among a population considered at risk of low academic achievement. Moreover, the study tested the moderating roles of class ethnic fit (i.e., feelings of fit based on having same-ethnic peers in class) and gender.

      Cross-sectional data came from a southwestern U.S. sample of Latinx adolescents (N = 329; 54% female, Mage = 13.69 years, SD = 0.56) who reported on maternal/paternal educational modeling, academic self-efficacy, math/science grades, class ethnic fit, and gender.

      Adolescents' perceptions of maternal modeling, but not paternal, related to higher levels of academic self-efficacy which, in turn, related to higher math/science performance. Moderation results revealed: (a) for adolescents who perceived low science class ethnic fit, high levels of parental modeling related to higher levels of academic self-efficacy which, in turn, were related to higher science grades, and (b) maternal modeling positively related to girls', but not boys', academic self-efficacy and paternal modeling positively related to girls', but not boys’, math/science performance.

      These results suggest maternal modeling is a promotive factor, supporting Latinx youths’ academic self-efficacy which, in turn, related to math/science grades. Additionally, a negative direct relation between maternal modeling and science grades suggests maternal modeling generally support academic self-efficacy, but not necessarily science attainment. These associations are nuanced as they are informed by context and parent-child gender.

    • Research article

      Performance decline in a low-stakes test at age 15 and educational attainment at age 25: Cross-country longitudinal evidence

      Journal of Adolescence, Volume 92, 2021, pp. 114-125

      Show abstractNavigate Down

      Educational attainment is associated with important life outcomes including labour market performance, health status, well-being, civic and political participation. An important question is whether it is possible to identify early those students who lack the achievement motivation that is needed to complete a higher education degree.

      Longitudinal follow-ups of representative samples of participants in the 2000 and 2003 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) from Australia, Denmark and Switzerland (N = 3110; 1130; and 1962; age = 15 to 27; % females 51%, 51%, 49%; ethnicity/race unknown) were used to identify the association between a measure of effort on a cognitively demanding low-stake task at age 15 – performance decline during the test – and educational attainment at age 25–27.

      A one SD difference in performance decline was associated with a 5–6 percentage point difference in the probability of obtaining tertiary-level qualifications (r = −0.15 in Australia; −0.11 in Denmark and −0.11 in Switzerland). We find no evidence of differences in this relationship across genders, socio-economic status and baseline levels of ability in the three countries. The association between performance decline and educational attainment is homogeneous across these groups. Self-reported measures of achievement motivation were not predictive of educational attainment in the three countries.

      Our work contributes new longitudinal evidence to the body of research in education employing behavioural measures of motivation and engagement. It can be used to understand the potential long-term consequences of disparities in students' preparation to sustain effort over cognitively demanding tasks.

    • Research article

      Self and parent-reported sleep problems of adolescents with childhood conduct problems and comorbid psychological problems

      Journal of Adolescence, Volume 92, 2021, pp. 165-176

      Show abstractNavigate Down

      Childhood conduct problems (CP) are characterized by maladaptive externalizing behaviors and are linked with poor sleep. CP are highly comorbid with other psychological problems, including attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and depression, which are also associated with disturbed sleep. The present study examined if childhood CP and comorbid depressive and/or attentional-hyperactivity problems were prospectively associated with parent and self-reported sleep difficulties in adolescence.

      Participants (N = 744; 53% boys) from an ongoing longitudinal study in Québec, Canada were assessed for CP and comorbidities when they were between 6 and 9 years old. Participants were classified as without CP, CP only, CP and depressive symptoms, CP and attention-hyperactivity problems, or CP, depressive symptoms, and attention-hyperactivity problems. Regressions were conducted to examine the associations between comorbidity groups, parent, and self-reported sleep problems 7 years later (Median age = 15.33 years), controlling for sex, age, family income, primary caregiver education and medication.

      Adolescents in all CP groups had higher self and parent-reported sleep problems compared to adolescents without histories of CP. Adolescents with histories of CP, depressive symptoms and attention-hyperactivity problems had more sleep problems than all other groups according to self-reports, but not parent-reports.

      Childhood CP was prospectively linked to sleep problems in adolescence, and comorbid conditions exacerbated these problems, according to youth but not parents.

    • Research article

      Bullying experiences, body esteem, body dissatisfaction, and the moderating role of weight status among adolescents

      Journal of Adolescence, Volume 91, 2021, pp. 59-70

      Show abstractNavigate Down

      The present study examined the relationships between bullying victimization experiences, body esteem (BE), and body dissatisfaction (BD) by obesity status.

      Using a cross-sectional design, adolescents (10-16y) from the U.S. completed surveys. Weight and height were objectively assessed. Bullying was assessed using the Personal Experiences Checklist, with a total score that included three subscales (cyber, verbal-relational, and physical). BE was assessed using total score on the BE Scale, and BD was assessed using the Body Image Assessment for Pre-Adolescents, operationalized as the discrepancy between current and ideal body figure. Linear regression models, controlling for sociodemographics, were used to examine obesity status (with vs. without obesity) and sex as moderators of the relationships between bullying, BE, and BD.

      On average, adolescents (n = 328) were 12.6 ± 1.9 y, 45.4% male, 58.2% White, 35.7% Black, and 36.0% had obesity. Obesity status moderated the relationship between bullying experiences and BE, such that these relationships were only significant (B = −0.38, p<.05) among adolescents with obesity compared to adolescents without obesity. In both groups, greater verbal-relational bullying experiences were associated with lower BE, while greater physical bullying experiences were related to higher BE only among adolescents with obesity. In adolescent girls without obesity, greater cyberbullying experiences were associated with lower BD.

      The findings suggest different associations between sub-types of bullying victimization experiences and BE and BD, highlighting the importance of examining these associations separately by obesity status.

    • Research article

      Examining the relationship between anhedonia symptoms and trait positive appraisal style in adolescents: A longitudinal survey study

      Journal of Adolescence, Volume 91, 2021, pp. 71-81

      Show abstractNavigate Down

      Anhedonia, defined as a loss of interest and pleasure in previously enjoyable activities, is a core symptom of depression that predicts a poor treatment response in adolescents. We know little about the cognitive vulnerability factors that contribute to the development of anhedonia in youth. This cross-sectional and longitudinal survey study investigated the link between anhedonia symptoms and cognitive appraisal of positive affect.

      Baseline data were collected from 392 secondary school students in the UK (aged 13–16, 54 % Female), 170 of whom went on to complete the three-month follow-up assessment (a 43 % response rate). Participants rated their anhedonia symptoms and appraisal styles which were measured in terms of use of amplifying appraisals, dampening appraisals, and fear of positive emotion.

      At baseline, greater anhedonia was significantly associated with increased levels of dampening and reduced levels of amplifying but was not significantly related to fear of positive emotion. Prospectively, greater baseline levels of amplifying uniquely predicted lower anhedonia severity at three-month follow-up, and vice-versa. There was no evidence for reciprocal prospective associations between anhedonia and, appraisal styles of dampening and fear of positive emotion.

      These results indicate that cognitive appraisal of positive affect is associated with concurrent and to some extent can predict future symptoms of anhedonia in youth.

    1

    Shared first authorship.

    View full text

    © 2021 The Foundation for Professionals in Services for Adolescents. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Does attachment theory apply to adolescence?

    Adolescence is an effective time for an intervention based on attachment theory, because parental attachment is still evolving but adolescents have the cognitive structures in place to engage in metacognitive analyses of their own attachment relationships (Allen, 2008).

    What is attachment theory adolescence?

    Adolescent attachment is the result of both the adolescent and parent's capacity to redefine their attachment relationship by taking into consideration the individuation process, that is, developmental changes at the social, cognitive, and emotional levels [7].

    What behaviors are linked to insecure attachment in adolescence?

    Findings from clinical samples are consistent with those from normative samples: insecure attachment is associated with suicidality (64), drug use (65), and aggressive and delinquent behaviour (66,67). Secure attachment is clearly important to healthy adolescent adjustment.

    What is insecure attachment in child development?

    Insecure attachment may take the form of avoidant, distant behavior or anxious clinging behavior. When children have insecure attachments with their parents, any number of negative consequences can follow, such as depression, anxiety, a lowered ability to cope with stress, and poor relationships with others.