So sánh gtx 660 vs 750ti năm 2024
cái này là thông số so sánh của nước ngoái nhé Show
Benchmarks These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware. 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score GeForce GTX 660 5090 points GeForce GTX 750 Ti 4590 points Difference: 500 (11%) Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks Power Consumption (Max TDP) GeForce GTX 750 Ti 60 Watts GeForce GTX 660 140 Watts Difference: 80 Watts (133%) Memory Bandwidth Performance-wise, the GeForce GTX 660 should theoretically be quite a bit better than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti overall. () GeForce GTX 660 144192 MB/sec GeForce GTX 750 Ti 86400 MB/sec Difference: 57792 (67%) Texel Rate The GeForce GTX 660 should be a lot (approximately 92%) more effective at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. () GeForce GTX 660 78400 Mtexels/sec GeForce GTX 750 Ti 40800 Mtexels/sec Difference: 37600 (92%) Pixel Rate If running with lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 660 is a better choice, by a large margin. () GeForce GTX 660 23520 Mpixels/sec GeForce GTX 750 Ti 16320 Mpixels/sec Difference: 7200 (44%) Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit. Nói tóm lại, con GTX 660 ăn điện nhiều hơn GTX 750Ti nên rất ít phòng nét sử dụng. Còn về hiệu năng và sức mạnh thì GTX 660 mạnh hơn GTX 750Ti đáng kể về mọi mặt. Trên là vài thông tin cho bạn tham khảo. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Pipelines / CUDA cores960640CUDA cores960640Core clock speed980 MHz1020 MHzBoost clock speed1033 MHz1085 MHzNumber of transistors2,540 million1,870 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm28 nmPower consumption (TDP)140 Watt60 WattTexture fill rate78.4 billion/sec43.40Floating-point performance1,981 gflops1,389 gflops Size and compatibilityInformation on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCI Express 3.0InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16Length9.5" (24.1 cm)5.7" (14.5 cm)Height4.376" (11.1 cm)4.376" (11.1 cm)Width2-slot2-slotSupplementary power connectorsOne 6-pinNoneSLI options+no data MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GBMemory bus width192-bit GDDR5128 BitMemory clock speed6.0 GB/s5.4 GB/sMemory bandwidth144.2 GB/s86.4 GB/sShared memoryno data- Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMIMulti monitor support4 displays4 displaysHDMI++HDCP++Maximum VGA resolution2048x15362048x1536Audio input for HDMIInternalInternal TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. 3D Blu-Ray+no dataBlu Ray 3Dno data+3D Gaming++3D Vision++3D Vision Liveno data+ API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)Shader Model5.15.1OpenGL4.34.6OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126CUDA++ Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. 660 outperforms 750 Ti by 3% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% 660 outperforms 750 Ti by 3% in Passmark. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% 660 outperforms 750 Ti by 17% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. GeekBench 5 OpenCLGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% GeekBench 5 VulkanGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% 660 outperforms 750 Ti by 17% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan. GeekBench 5 CUDAGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 4% 750 Ti outperforms 660 by 46% in GeekBench 5 CUDA. Octane Render OctaneBenchThis is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists. Benchmark coverage: 4% 750 Ti outperforms 660 by 6% in Octane Render OctaneBench. Mining hashratesCryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti. Usually measured in megahashes per second. Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 66 Mh/s 183 Mh/s Decred / DCR (Decred) no data 0.51 Gh/s Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) no data 2.3 Mh/s Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) no data 0.25 kh/s Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) no data 74.4 Sol/s Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 10.31 10.05 Recency 6 September 2012 18 February 2014 Cost $229 $149 Memory bus width 192 128 Pipelines / CUDA cores 960 640 Memory bandwidth 144.2 86.4 Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 60 Watt We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti. The differences in performance seem too small. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce GTX 660 GeForce GTX 750 Ti Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
