What happens in brain development after the peak of synaptic density about age 3?
Journal Article Show
Elizabeth L Prado, Department of Nutrition, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, USA SUMMIT Institute of Development, Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia Correspondence: EL Prado, Program in International and Community Nutrition, University of California at Davis, 3253 Meyer Hall, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USA. E-mail: . Phone: +1-530-752-1992. Fax: +1-530-752-3406. Search for other works by this author on: Kathryn G DeweyDepartment of Nutrition, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, USA SUMMIT Institute of Development, Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia Search for other works by this author on:
Close Navbar Search Filter Microsite Search Term Search AbstractPresented here is an overview of the pathway from early nutrient deficiency to long-term brain function, cognition, and productivity, focusing on research from low- and middle-income countries. Animal models have demonstrated the importance of adequate nutrition for the neurodevelopmental processes that occur rapidly during pregnancy and infancy, such as neuron proliferation and myelination. However, several factors influence whether nutrient deficiencies during this period cause permanent cognitive deficits in human populations, including the child's interaction with the environment, the timing and degree of nutrient deficiency, and the possibility of recovery. These factors should be taken into account in the design and interpretation of future research. Certain types of nutritional deficiency clearly impair brain development, including severe acute malnutrition, chronic undernutrition, iron deficiency, and iodine deficiency. While strategies such as salt iodization and micronutrient powders have been shown to improve these conditions, direct evidence of their impact on brain development is scarce. Other strategies also require further research, including supplementation with iron and other micronutrients, essential fatty acids, and fortified food supplements during pregnancy and infancy. IntroductionAdequate nutrition is necessary for normal brain development. Nutrition is especially important during pregnancy and infancy, which are crucial periods for the formation of the brain, laying the foundation for the development of cognitive, motor, and socio-emotional skills throughout childhood and adulthood. Thus, nutritional deficiencies during pregnancy and infancy are likely to affect cognition, behavior, and productivity throughout the school years and adulthood. Focusing on this early period for the prevention of nutrient deficiencies may have long-term and widespread benefits for individuals and societies. This article presents an overview of the pathway from early nutritional deprivation to long-term brain function, cognition, behavior, and productivity. Although nutrition is important for brain function throughout the lifespan, this article focuses on nutrition during pregnancy and the first few years after birth, which is the period of most rapid brain development. Presented first are the biological mechanisms through which nutrient deficiencies in pregnancy and infancy may affect brain development. Most of this evidence at the cellular and molecular level is from animal studies. Although these animal models have demonstrated the importance of adequate nutrition for the developing brain, many factors influence whether undernutrition during pregnancy and infancy leads to permanent cognitive deficits in human populations. The second part of this article discusses four of those factors: 1) the amount and quality of stimulation the child receives from the environment; 2) the timing of nutrient deprivation; 3) the degree of nutrient deficiency; and 4) the possibility of recovery. Finally, a brief review of human studies is presented, focusing on research from low- and middle-income countries, where multiple nutrient deficiencies are prevalent among pregnant women and children.1 Also addressed in this review are the long-term consequences of undernutrition in early life, randomized trials of food and protein/energy supplementation, and studies of breastfeeding practices, essential fatty acids, and certain specific micronutrients, in addition to implications for policy, programs, and future research. Role of Nutrients in Brain DevelopmentApproximately 22 days after conception, the neural plate begins to fold inward, forming the neural tube, which eventually becomes the brain and spinal cord.2 Adequate nutrition is necessary from the beginning, with the formation of the neural plate and neural tube affected by nutrients such as folic acid, copper, and vitamin A. Seven weeks after conception, cell division begins within the neural tube, creating nerve cells (neurons) and glial cells (cells that support neurons). After a neuron is created, it migrates to its place in the brain, where it then grows axons and dendrites projecting out from its cell body. These branching projections make connections with other cells, called synapses, through which nerve signals travel from one cell to another. These neurodevelopmental processes begin during gestation and continue throughout infancy (see Table 1). Groups of neurons form pathways, which are refined through the programmed elimination of cells and connections. About half of all the cells that are produced in the brain are subsequently eliminated throughout childhood and adolescence. Synapses are also overproduced and then selectively eliminated. Some of this refining of neural pathways depends on the child's experience, or in other words, input from the child's environment. Cells and connections that are activated are retained and strengthened while those that are not used are eliminated. This is thought to be one of the primary mechanisms of brain plasticity, allowing the brain to organize itself to adapt to the environment and reorganize itself to recover from injury during development.2 Table 1 Evidence for the role of selected nutrients and experience in five key neurodevelopmental processes
a The gestational period in rodents corresponds to the first half of pregnancy in humans, while the first 3 weeks after birth in rodents corresponds to the second half of pregnancy in humans.46 Abbreviations: BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; GABAB, gamma-aminobutyric acid B; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor-1; IUGR, intrauterine growth restriction; NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate. Table 1 Evidence for the role of selected nutrients and experience in five key neurodevelopmental processes
a The gestational period in rodents corresponds to the first half of pregnancy in humans, while the first 3 weeks after birth in rodents corresponds to the second half of pregnancy in humans.46 Abbreviations: BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; GABAB, gamma-aminobutyric acid B; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor-1; IUGR, intrauterine growth restriction; NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate. Evidence from animal models of nutrient deficiency, and some evidence from human studies, clearly shows that many nutrients are necessary for brain development. Table 1 presents evidence for the effect of specific nutrient deficiencies during early development on five key neurodevelopmental processes: 1) neuron proliferation, 2) axon and dendrite growth, 3) synapse formation, pruning, and function, 4) myelination, and 5) neuron apoptosis (programmed cell death). Table 1 focuses on nutrients that have been studied in human as well as animal studies. Other nutrients, such as copper, which is also important for some of these neurodevelopmental processes, are not included since rigorous studies in human populations and intervention studies have not yet been conducted. Although the necessity of nutrients for brain development is evident, the extent to which nutrient deprivation during gestation and infancy results in long-term effects on brain function in free-living human populations is not yet clear. The actual impact depends on several factors, including 1) the child's experience and input from the environment, 2) the timing of nutrient deprivation, 3) the degree of nutrient deficiency, and 4) the possibility of recovery. Each of these factors is discussed in the following sections, followed by a brief discussion of methodological factors that can also influence the results of nutrition studies. Factors Influencing the Impact of UndernutritionExperience and input from the environmentBrain development is affected by experience. Two types of processes are described as “experience-expectant” and “experience-dependent.”41 In experience-expectant processes, the brain relies on specific input for normal development. For example, the brain expects visual input through the optic nerve for normal development of the visual cortex.41 The absence of these expected experiences impairs the neurodevelopmental processes that depend on them. These experience-expectant processes also depend on other types of sensory stimulation (e.g., auditory and tactile) and occur early in life. In contrast, “experience-dependent” processes refer to the way the brain organizes itself in response to an individual's experiences and acquired skills, which is a process that continues throughout the lifespan. For example, a neuroimaging study demonstrated that the rear hippocampus, a part of the brain that underlies spatial memory, increased in volume as London taxi-driver trainees learned the layout of the city streets.47 While experience-expectant mechanisms refer to features of the environment that are (or should be) universal, experience-dependent mechanisms refer to aspects of the environment that are unique to the individual. These latter processes enable individuals to adapt to and thrive in their specific culture and environment. Adequate nutrition can be considered an aspect of the environment that is expected by the brain for normal development.48 An environment with poor quality and variety of sensory and social input impairs some of the same neurodevelopmental processes as nutrient deprivation during early development, including the complexity of dendritic branching and synaptic density (Table 1). The parallel influences of nutrient deficiency and stimulation from the environment on brain development may operate in several ways: additive effects, interacting effects, and mediating effects, all of which have been demonstrated in empirical studies. These are depicted in Figure 1 and discussed in greater detail below. Figure 1 Three hypothetical scenarios in which the effects of undernutrition and a poor-quality environment may show additive or interacting effects on children's motor, cognitive, and socioemotional development. A Additive effects of undernutrition and poor-quality environment. B An enriched environment protects children from negative effects of undernutrition. C Nutrition intervention only affects children who have adequate stimulation, or stimulation intervention only affects children who have adequate nutrition. Additive effectsNutrient deficiency and experiential input from the environment may have independent additive effects on brain development. In this case, in an at-risk population, one would expect children with both risk factors (nutrient deficiency and low stimulation) to perform at low levels, children with one risk factor (nutrient deficiency or low stimulation) to perform at average levels, and children with neither risk factor (sufficient nutrition and high stimulation) to perform at high levels in cognitive, motor, and socioemotional development. This pattern is shown in Figure 1a. In support of this hypothesis, several studies have shown that nutritional supplementation and psychosocial stimulation together result in greater improvements in child development than either intervention alone.49,50 In these studies, psychosocial stimulation consisted of periodic home visits during which community workers facilitated play sessions with mothers and children. The community workers conducted activities such as demonstrating play with homemade toys, emphasizing the quality of the verbal interactions between mothers and children, and teaching concepts such as color, shape, size, and number. Children in Costa Rica showed similar additive effects of iron-deficiency anemia in infancy and low socioeconomic status on cognitive scores at school age.51 Interacting effectsAlternatively, nutrient deficiency or intervention may affect some children but not others, depending on the amount and quality of stimulation they receive. For example, in Chile, low-birth-weight infants born into families with high socioeconomic status were at lower risk for poor developmental outcomes than those born into disadvantaged environments.52 Similarly, in 6−8-year-old children in Vietnam, nutritional status was related to cognitive scores among children who did not participate in a preschool program at age 3−4 years, but not among those who did.53 Thus, in some cases, stimulation from the environment can protect children from negative effects of undernutrition on development. This possibility is shown in Figure 1b. Conversely, undernourished children from disadvantaged homes where protective factors are lacking may show more of a developmental response to nutrition and other forms of interventions. For example, in Guatemala, the effect of a supplementary protein/energy drink on infant and preschool development was greatest among families of low socioeconomic status.54 In Chile, 1 year of weekly home visits providing psychosocial stimulation increased cognitive and socioemotional scores in infants with iron-deficiency anemia (IDA), but not in infants without IDA.55 Another way that nutrition and stimulation may interact is that nutritional supplementation may only positively affect development among children who receive a certain amount of stimulation from the environment. If children do not receive any stimulation, improving nutrition alone may be insufficient to improve brain development. For example, in Jamaica, infants between the ages of 9 and 30 months who participated in a psychosocial stimulation intervention benefited from zinc supplementation, while those who did not receive psychosocial stimulation did not show any developmental benefit from supplementary zinc.56 It is also possible that an intervention providing psychosocial stimulation may only benefit children who are adequately nourished. In an animal model of maternal choline deficiency, 7-month-old rodents were exposed to an environmental enrichment experience by being allowed to explore a maze once daily for 12 days. Rodents whose mothers had been given choline during gestation showed increased neurogenesis in the hippocampus through the enriching experience, while rodents whose mothers had been deprived of choline during gestation did not show altered neurogenesis.57 This type of pattern is illustrated in Figure 1c. Mediating effectsFinally, improving nutritional status may actually improve children's experiences and the stimulation they receive from the environment. Undernutrition affects physical growth, physical activity, and motor development, which may, in turn, influence brain development through two pathways. The first pathway is through caregiver behavior and the second is through child exploration of the environment54,58 (see Figure 2). First, caregivers may treat children who are small for their age as younger than they actually are, and thus not provide age-appropriate stimulation, which could result in altered brain development. Also, undernourished children may be frequently ill and therefore fussy, irritable, and withdrawn, leading caregivers to treat them more negatively than they would treat a happy, healthy child. Reduced activity due to undernutrition may limit the child's exploration of the environment and initiation of caregiver interactions, which could also lead to poor brain development.59 Some evidence suggests that these mechanisms contribute to delayed motor and cognitive development in infants and children with IDA.60,61 However, in stunted Jamaican infants, nutritional supplementation affected cognitive development but not activity levels, and activity and development were not related to each other, suggesting that this mechanism did not mediate the effect of nutrition on cognitive development in this cohort.62 Figure 2 Hypothetical scenario in which the child's experience acts as a mediator between nutritional status and motor, cognitive, and socioemotional development. Adapted from Levitsky and Barnes58 and Pollitt.54 Few studies have examined the potential additive, interacting, and mediating effects of nutrition and experiential input from the environment on child motor, cognitive, and socioemotional development. Studies that have tested all of these in a systematic way could not be located in the existing literature. In future research, datasets that allow the testing of each of these hypotheses are needed. Timing of nutrient deprivation or supplementationNutrient deficiency is more likely to impair brain development if the deficiency occurs during a time period when the need for that nutrient for neurodevelopment is high. Various nutrients are necessary for specific neurodevelopmental processes. Each process occurs in different, overlapping time periods in different brain areas. The timing of five key neurodevelopmental processes is presented in the first row of Table 1. Drawing links between specific nutrients, specific neurodevelopmental processes, and the time period of deprivation or supplementation allows specific hypotheses to be made concerning the effect of nutrient deprivation or supplementation on brain development. For example, myelination of the brainstem auditory pathway occurs from week 26 of gestation until at least 1 year after birth.63 Fatty acids such as docosahexaeonic acid (DHA) are necessary for myelination. This leads to the hypothesis that supplementation with DHA in the third trimester and the first year after birth may improve myelination of this auditory pathway. The latency of auditory-evoked potentials, which measure electrical activity in response to an auditory stimulus through electrodes placed on the scalp, is thought to reflect myelination, among other physiological aspects of brain function.64 In support of the effect of DHA on myelination of the brainstem auditory pathway during the first few months after birth, a study in Turkey demonstrated that infants fed a formula containing DHA showed more rapid brainstem auditory-evoked potentials at age 16 weeks than infants fed a formula without DHA.65 Future studies that examine precise hypotheses related to specific nutrients, neurodevelopmental processes, timing, and brain areas are needed to clarify the relationship between nutrition and brain development and its mechanisms. For a more complete discussion of the timing of neurodevelopmental processes and implications for measurement see Georgieff66 and Wachs et al.67 Degree of nutrient deficiencyMuch evidence shows that brain development may be compromised when nutrient deficiency is severe to moderate but spared when deficiency is mild to moderate. A number of homeostatic mechanisms protect the developing fetus and the developing brain from nutrient deficiency to a certain degree. For example, in the case of placental insufficiency, when insufficient nutrients and oxygen are available, fetal cardiac output is redistributed such that blood flow to the peripheral tissues decreases and blood flow to the brain, adrenal glands, and heart increases. This leads to brain sparing, or the sparing of brain growth even when overall fetal growth is reduced.68 Another mechanism that protects the fetus from iron deficiency to a certain degree is the increased transfer of iron across the placenta as maternal levels decrease.69 For each nutrient, there is likely to be a threshold at which deficiency results in impairment for the child. Exactly where this line is drawn is an important question which must be answered for each nutrient individually. Several studies have shown that the effect of nutritional supplementation on brain development depends on initial nutritional status. For example, in Bangladesh and Indonesia, a positive effect of maternal multiple micronutrient supplementation during pregnancy and postpartum on child motor and cognitive development was found only in children of undernourished mothers.70,71 Similarly, in Chile, infants with low hemoglobin concentration at age 6 months showed improved cognition at age 10 years if they had been fed iron-fortified formula (compared to low-iron formula) during infancy, whereas children with high hemoglobin concentration at age 6 months performed better in cognitive tasks at age 10 years if they had received low-iron formula.72 In summary, greater severity of nutritional deficiency increases both the likelihood of negative effects on brain development and the likelihood of positively responding to nutritional supplementation. Possibility of recoveryEven if the timing and the degree of nutrient deficiency are sufficient to alter brain development, one important question is whether these changes can be subsequently corrected. If not, children undernourished in early life would show permanent developmental deficits. On the other hand, if some or all of these structural alterations can be corrected, children could partly or fully recover cognitive ability. The brain's potential for recovery from early damage has been widely studied in the context of neurological injury during development. When a certain part of the brain is damaged during early life, recovery happens in three ways, depending on the timing of the injury and subsequent experience. First, there are changes in the organization of the remaining intact circuits in the brain that were left uninjured, involving the generation of new synapses in existing pathways. Second, new circuitry that did not exist before the injury develops. Third, neurons and glia are generated to replace the injured neurons and glia.73 In the case of brain alterations caused by nutrient deficiency, recovery is plausible if nutrients become available during the time that the affected growth process is still occurring. In addition to nutrient repletion, enhanced sensory, linguistic, and social interactions may also facilitate recovery. Data from a group of Korean orphans adopted by middle-class American families provided an opportunity to investigate the possibility of recovery. Children who were undernourished at the time of adoption (before age 2 years) did not score below the normal range on IQ tests at school age, but their scores were lower than those of Korean adoptees who had not been undernourished in infancy.74 In addition, children adopted after age 2 years had lower IQ scores than those adopted before age 2 years, suggesting that improved conditions earlier rather than later in childhood provide a greater benefit.75 Other investigators have studied adults who were born during a period of famine in Holland during World War II when strict food rations were imposed on the entire Dutch population, including pregnant women. Children born during this period experienced nutrient deprivation in utero but adequate nutrition and health care thereafter. At age 19 years, their average IQ did not differ from that of a group whose mothers did not experience famine during pregnancy.76 However, adults exposed to this famine in utero had increased risk of diagnosis of schizophrenia77 and antisocial personality disorder,78 as well as admittance to an addiction treatment program.79 Together, this evidence suggests that some, but not all, of the negative effects of early undernutrition on brain development can be reversed through subsequent improvement in nutrition, health care, and enriched environments. In these studies, the role of improved nutrition and the role of stimulation from the environment in recovery cannot be distinguished. Other evidence suggests that both of these can contribute to cognitive recovery after early undernutrition. In a large cohort of Peruvian children (n = 1,674), children who had been stunted before age 18 months but who were not stunted at age 4−6 years performed as well as children who had never been stunted in vocabulary and quantitative tests, while children who did not experience catch-up growth scored significantly lower.80 In other studies, providing cognitive stimulation to children who suffered from an episode of severe acute malnutrition or IDA in early life improved mental and motor development.55,81 This type of evidence has led the World Health Organization to recommend structured activities to promote cognitive development as a component of the treatment of early childhood malnutrition, in addition to nutrition and healthcare.82 Methodological factorsThe selection of assessment tools and the age of assessment can also influence whether effects are found in nutrition studies. Global measures, such as the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) or IQ tests, are widely used but may be less sensitive to nutritional deficiency than tests of specific cognitive abilities.83,–85 In addition, using a test created in a high-income country in a low-income country without adaptation can lead to systematic bias.86,87 For a more complete discussion of assessing cognitive abilities in nutrition studies, see Isaacs and Oates.84 Detecting the effects of early nutrient deficiency can also depend on the age of cognitive assessment. For example, a group of children who experienced thiamine deficiency in infancy did not show neurological symptoms at the time of deficiency, but showed language impairment at age 5–7 years.88 Similarly, in a randomized controlled trial, infants who received formula containing certain fatty acids (docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid) showed higher vocabulary and IQ scores at age 5–6 years compared to infants who received formula without these fatty acids, even though they did not differ in vocabulary or BSID scores at age 18 months.85 These examples show that long-term effects may be found even when immediate effects of early nutritional deficiency are not apparent. In summary, the long-term effect of nutritional deficiency on brain development depends on the timing and degree of deficiency, as well as the quality of the child's environment. Recovery is possible with nutrient repletion during a time period when the affected neurodevelopmental process is ongoing and with enhanced interaction with caregivers and other aspects of the environment. Brief Review of Human StudiesAs shown in Table 1, research in animals has demonstrated the effects of many specific nutrient deficiencies on the development of brain structure and function. However, studies examining the effect of mild to moderate undernutrition on brain development in free-living mothers and children have largely shown mixed or inconclusive results. The factors discussed such as the timing and degree of deficiency and interactions with the amount of stimulation children receive may account for some of these mixed results. In addition, in many studies, undernutrition is confounded by other factors such as poverty, unstimulating environments, little maternal education, poor healthcare, and preterm birth, which make it difficult to isolate the effects of nutrition. To do this, randomized controlled trials are needed, but few of these specifically examining neurobehavioral outcomes have been conducted. The following sections briefly review studies of the long-term consequences of undernutrition in early life, food and protein/energy supplementation, breastfeeding practices, essential fatty acids, and certain specific micronutrients, with a focus on studies from low- and middle-income countries. Long-term consequences of undernutrition in early lifeMany studies have compared school-age children who had suffered from an episode of severe acute malnutrition in the first few years of life to matched controls or siblings who had not. These studies generally showed that those who had suffered from early malnutrition had poorer IQ levels, cognitive function, and school achievement, as well as greater behavioral problems.89 A recent study in Barbados showed that adults who had suffered from an episode of moderate to severe malnutrition in the first year of life showed more attention problems90 and lower social status and standard of living91 than matched controls, even after 37–43 years. Chronic malnutrition, as measured by physical growth that is far below average for a child's age, is also associated with reduced cognitive and motor development. From the first year of life through school age, children who are short for their age (stunted) or underweight for their age score lower than their normal-sized peers (on average) in cognitive and motor tasks and in school achievement. Longitudinal studies that have followed children from infancy throughout childhood have also consistently shown that children who became stunted (height for age < −2 SD below norm values) before 2 years of age continued to show deficits in cognition and school achievement from the age of 5 years to adolescence.92 Growth faltering can begin before birth, and the evidence indicates that being born small for gestational age is associated with mild to moderately low performance in school during childhood and adolescence, and with lower psychological and intellectual performance in young adulthood.93 However, recent studies in low- and middle-income countries that have examined the relationship between low birth weight (<2,500 g/5.5 lb) and IQ, behavior problems, and academic achievement in school-age children, with and without controlling for gestational age at birth, have shown mixed results.94 In a large study in Taiwan, adolescents who were born at term with low birth weight scored slightly but significantly lower than those born at term with normal birth weight on language, math, and science tests.95 However, no effects of full-term low birth weight on IQ or behavior problems were found between the ages of 6−12 years in recent studies in Jamaica, Brazil, and South Africa.96,–98 As discussed earlier, certain protective factors after birth may reduce the risk of long-term effects of low birth weight, such as high socioeconomic status,52 cognitive stimulation in early life,81 catch-up growth in height, and increased duration of breastfeeding.93 The mechanism of brain sparing, also discussed earlier, may also be a protective factor. One well-controlled study showed cognitive deficits at 7 years of age in children who had been low-birth-weight infants compared to their normal-birth-weight siblings only if head growth was also compromised.99 Another study showed that the ratio of neonatal head circumference to birth weight (cephalization index) was a better predictor of IQ at 3 years of age (inverse association) than was birth weight (positive association).100 This evidence shows that severe acute malnutrition and chronic malnutrition are clearly associated with impaired cognitive development, while the effects of growth faltering before birth are less clear and may be amenable to cognitive recovery. Food and protein/energy supplementationChildren who experience severe acute malnutrition, chronic malnutrition, and low birth weight tend to face other disadvantages that also affect brain development, such as poverty, poor housing and sanitation, poor healthcare, and less stimulating home environments, making it difficult to draw a causal link from observational studies. The results of randomized trials of maternal and child food supplementation, which provide stronger evidence of causation, are mixed (Table 2). Such trials that provided supplements to both mothers during pregnancy and children throughout the first 2 years of life showed the strongest evidence for long-term positive effects regarding cognition. In a large trial in Guatemala, pregnant women and their children up to the age of 7 years were provided with a milk-based high protein and energy drink with micronutrients or a low protein and energy drink with micronutrients. Children who received the high protein and energy drink had higher cognitive scores at 4–5 years of age, higher scores on tests of numeracy (math), knowledge, vocabulary, and reading achievement at 11–18 years of age54 and on reading and IQ scores (among women) at 22–29 years of age,101 and a 46% increase in average wages (among men) at 26–42 years of age.102 While some of the effects on school-age performance were found in the late exposure group (after the age of 2 years), most of these effects were only found among individuals who began supplementation before the age of 2 or 3 years, including the effect on average wages. In contrast, few long-term effects have been reported when supplementation was provided only to mothers or only to children, though some such trials have demonstrated short-term cognitive and motor effects (Table 2). Table 2 Randomized trials of food supplementation with micronutrients and/or balanced protein and energy to mothers and/or children and their effect on brain development
Abbreviations: BSID, Bayley Scales of Infant Development. Table 2 Randomized trials of food supplementation with micronutrients and/or balanced protein and energy to mothers and/or children and their effect on brain development
Abbreviations: BSID, Bayley Scales of Infant Development. Apart from the trial in Guatemala, only a trial in Jamaica113 conducted longitudinal assessment at multiple time points throughout childhood and adolescence (Table 2). Although this trial did not show long-term effects of the nutrition component of the intervention, the psychosocial stimulation component resulted in sustained effects on IQ, language, and reading ability up to 18 years of age.113 The authors suggested that the lack of sustained effects of the nutrition component may have been because beginning supplementation sometime between 9 and 24 months was too late or because the supplements may not have been consumed exclusively by the children. They indicated that beginning supplementation at an earlier age or achieving higher compliance with supplement consumption may have resulted in more lasting effects.113 Together, this evidence suggests that adequate nutrition during pregnancy and throughout infancy is necessary for optimal cognitive development. However, the most effective timing for nutritional supplementation is not yet clear, since few randomized trials have been conducted and even fewer have evaluated cognition and other outcomes in adolescence and adulthood. Breastfeeding practicesBreastfeeding may improve cognitive development through several potential mechanisms, related both to the composition of breast milk and to the experience of breastfeeding. A suite of nutrients, growth factors, and hormones that are important for brain development are abundant in breastmilk, including critical building blocks such as DHA and choline.115,–117 Also, the physical act of breastfeeding may foster a positive mother-infant relationship and enhance mother-infant interaction, which are important for cognitive and socioemotional development. Breastfeeding also elicits a hormonal response in mothers during each feeding session, which may reduce stress and depression and thus improve infant caregiving and mother-infant interaction.118 In high-income countries, children who are breastfed as infants tend to have higher IQs at school-age than children fed with formula. Meta-analyses have yielded pooled estimates of 3−5 IQ points favoring children who had been breastfed,119,–121 with higher estimates among those born with low birth weight (5−8 IQ points).120,121 However, not all studies have found this positive relationship122 and this relationship may be confounded by other factors, since mothers from higher socioeconomic backgrounds and with higher IQs are generally more likely to breastfeed in high-income countries.123,124 This problem of confounding is less likely in low- and middle-income countries. For example, among a group of mothers in the Philippines, those from the poorest environments breastfed the longest125 and in two separate cohorts in Brazil, socioeconomic status was unrelated to breastfeeding practices.126,127 The study in the Philippines showed that increased duration of breastfeeding was associated with better cognitive performance at age 8−11 years.125 The first study in Brazil demonstrated that children who were breastfed for 9 months or more were ahead by 0.5 to 0.8 school grades at age 18 years relative to those breastfed for less than 1 month.126 The second study in Brazil showed that higher IQ scores at age 4 years were associated with increased duration of breastfeeding, with children who were breastfed for 6 months or more scoring 6 IQ points higher than those breastfed for less than 1 month. Together, these positive associations between longer duration of breastfeeding and higher IQ and school achievement, after controlling for potential confounders, support the idea that a causal relationship exists. The strongest evidence supporting the conclusion that breastfeeding is beneficial for brain development is from a large cluster-randomized trial in Belarus.128 Clinics were randomly assigned to a breastfeeding promotion intervention or standard healthcare. Mothers in the breastfeeding promotion group had higher rates of any breastfeeding from birth to 12 months of age and higher rates of exclusive breastfeeding when the infants were 3 months of age. At a subsequent follow-up (mean age, 6.5 years), children in the breastfeeding promotion group had higher IQ scores and higher teacher ratings of reading and writing ability. This evidence indicates that promotion of breastfeeding can be an effective strategy to improve children's cognitive development.59 Essential fatty acidsAs shown in Table 1, essential fatty acids (EFA) and their derivatives are important for membrane function, synapse function, and myelination. Researchers have examined whether feeding infants formula containing these fatty acids positively affects cognitive development compared to standard formula that does not contain them. The authors of two recent papers, the first reporting a review129 and the second a meta-analysis130 of randomized controlled trials, concluded that EFA-containing formula does not affect general neurobehavioral development in full-term infants.130 A positive effect among preterm infants, who are at risk for deficiency in certain fatty acids, including DHA, has been more frequently found.129 Preterm infants are at risk because fatty acids accumulate rapidly in the brain during the third trimester of pregnancy.131 Preterm birth interrupts this accumulation and puts the infant at risk for deficiency. However, in the report of Qawasmi et al.,130 the pooled effect of EFA-containing formula on development among preterm infants was not significant. Note that most of the studies included in these two papers examined the effects on BSID scores. As discussed above, a recently published study showed a positive effect of EFA-containing formula on vocabulary and IQ at the age of 5–6 years even when no effect on 18-month BSID scores was found: this suggests the latter measure may not be sensitive enough to detect effects. Supplementary EFA may benefit children in low- and middle-income countries whose diets may be lacking in EFA. However, very little research has been conducted in these countries. Studies in Turkey, Ghana, and China suggest that supplementation with EFA may affect infant neurodevelopment65 and motor development.132,133 However, other trials in Africa did not find any difference in mental or motor development, e.g., in the Gambia, when fish oil was provided from 3 to 9 months,134 and in Malawi, when complementary foods that differed in fatty acid content were provided from 6 to 18 months.135 In the trial in the Gambia, the lack of effect is understandable, given that the infants were not deficient in fatty acids at baseline. Similarly, the latter trial was conducted in an area near Lake Malawi, where maternal fish consumption may result in relatively high levels of key fatty acids in breast milk, possibly masking any effects of supplementary EFA. The effect of EFA on brain development during pregnancy is also not yet clear. While fatty acids are important for fetal neurodevelopment, randomized trials of maternal EFA supplementation have yielded mixed results. Gould et al.136 recently conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials of maternal DHA supplementation. The meta-analysis on cognitive, language, and motor scores revealed no differences between supplemented and control children from birth to age 12 years, except for cognitive scores in children between the ages of 2 and 5 years. The authors concluded that methodological limitations in the 11 trials reviewed precluded confidence in the results; therefore, additional methodologically sound studies are needed, especially in children from disadvantaged or low-income backgrounds.136 MicronutrientsMicronutrient deficiency is a critical concern for mothers and children throughout the world. It is estimated that 25% of the world's population suffers from IDA,137 33% have insufficient zinc intake,138 and 30% have inadequate iodine intake.139 Each of these micronutrients is involved in brain development (Table 1) and deficiencies are likely to impair cognitive, motor, and socioemotional abilities. IronIron is an essential structural component of the hemoglobin molecule, which transports oxygen to all the organs of the body, including the brain. IDA, that is, underproduction of hemoglobin due to iron deficiency, is a risk factor for both short-term and long-term cognitive impairment. IDA during infancy is associated with poor mental and motor development and during later childhood, with poor cognition and school achievement. Longitudinal studies have also consistently demonstrated that children who had been anemic before 2 years of age continued to show deficits in cognition and school achievement from 4 to 19 years of age.140 These long-term effects of infant IDA may persist even if iron treatment is provided during infancy. In longitudinal studies, adolescents who had been iron-deficient anemic in infancy continued to score lower than their non-anemic peers in IQ, social problems, and inattention, even though they were given iron treatment as infants.141 Prenatal iron supplementation may prevent some of these deficits. However, among three randomized trials of maternal iron supplementation during pregnancy that measured subsequent cognitive development of the children, only one showed positive results. In that trial, which was conducted in an area of Nepal with a high prevalence of IDA, children whose mothers had received iron, folic acid, and vitamin A performed better than those whose mothers had received vitamin A alone on tests of non-verbal intelligence, executive function, and motor ability at 7−9 years of age.142 Two trials in China and Australia did not demonstrate effects of maternal iron supplementation on BSID scores at 3, 6, or 12 months of age143 or on IQ at 4 years of age.144 Provision of iron to infants in low- and middle-income countries, where rates of iron deficiency are usually high, has consistently led to improved outcomes at the end of the intervention period. These trials are different from treatment trials in that all children are included, even if they have not been diagnosed with IDA, and the dose of iron is lower. Of five such trials, all showed positive effects on motor development, two on cognitive/language development, and three on socioemotional development.141 These short-term results suggest that provision of iron to populations at risk for iron deficiency could have long-lasting positive effects. However, two recent follow-up studies reported no effect of iron supplementation in infancy on motor and cognitive ability at age 3.5 years in Sweden145 and 7−9 years in Nepal.146,147 However, the study in Sweden found a significant impact on socioemotional development. Further long-term follow-up studies that examine cognitive, motor, and socioemotional skills are needed. Importantly, the provision of iron in malaria-endemic regions should be accompanied by adequate malaria surveillance and treatment.148 Taken as a whole, the evidence indicates that IDA during infancy is a strong risk factor for cognitive, motor, and socioemotional impairment in both the short and long term. Avoiding such consequences may require control of iron deficiency before it becomes severe or chronic, starting with adequate maternal iron intake before and during pregnancy and delayed cord clamping at birth.149 Other elements of an appropriate strategy include preventing premature birth, feeding children iron-rich complementary foods, and providing postnatal services that promote responsive mother-infant interactions and early learning opportunities.150 IodineIodine is necessary for the synthesis of thyroid hormones, which are essential for central nervous system development, including neurogenesis, neuronal migration, axon and dendrite growth, synaptogenesis, and myelination (Table 1). Pregnant women with severe iodine deficiency may underproduce thyroid hormones, leading to cretinism in the child. Cretinism is a disorder characterized by mental retardation, facial deformities, deaf-mutism, and severely stunted growth. Cretinism cannot be reversed after birth but can be prevented by the correction of iodine deficiency before conception.151 Even in the absence of overt cretinism, the evidence suggests that chronic iodine deficiency negatively affects intelligence. A meta-analysis showed a 13.5 IQ point difference between individuals living in iodine-sufficient and iodine-deficient areas.152 Another more recent meta-analysis of studies in China indicated a similar estimated difference of 12.5 IQ points.153 These results are equivalent to an effect size of 0.8–0.9 standard deviations. Although striking, these correlational studies may be confounded by uncontrolled factors, and randomized controlled trials of iodine supplementation in school-age children have yielded inconsistent results.154 Pregnancy seems to be a sensitive period with regard to the effects of iodine deficiency on neurodevelopment, since cretinism develops during this period. In an iodine-deficient region in China, 4–7-year-old children whose mothers were given iodine during pregnancy performed better on a psychomotor test than those who were supplemented beginning at 2 years of age.155 A recent study in the United Kingdom suggests that even mild iodine deficiency in the first trimester of pregnancy can negatively affect children's cognition 8 years later. Among over 1,000 8-year-old children in the UK, those whose mothers had been iodine deficient in the first trimester of pregnancy were more likely to have scores in the lowest quartile for verbal IQ and reading comprehension.156 Only two small randomized controlled trials of iodine supplementation during pregnancy have examined neurobehavioral outcomes, one among 72 mothers in Peru and another among 75 mothers in the Democratic Republic of Congo.157 The average effect on the IQ scores of the children in these two trials at age 0–5 years was 10.2 IQ points.157 Bougma et al.157 also reviewed non-randomized iodine intervention studies and cohort studies in children age 5 years and under and found average effect sizes of 6.9–8.1 IQ points. The authors concluded that additional well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to quantify more precisely the contribution of iodine deficiency to brain development in young children, including trials examining iodized salt.157 Though few well-designed controlled studies have been reported, adequate iodine intake is clearly necessary for normal brain development. Prevention of iodine deficiency, especially for pregnant mothers, is an important way to promote healthy brain development in children worldwide. ZincZinc is the fourth most abundant ion in the brain, where it contributes to brain structure and function through its role in DNA and RNA synthesis and the metabolism of protein, carbohydrates, and fat.158 Although maternal and infant zinc deficiency in animals causes deficits in activity, attention, learning, and memory,159 the evidence to date from human studies has not shown positive effects of zinc supplementation during pregnancy or infancy on child cognitive development. Randomized trials of zinc supplementation during pregnancy in the United States, Peru, Nepal, and Bangladesh have shown no effects142,160,161 or negative effects162 of zinc compared to placebo or other micronutrients on the motor and cognitive abilities of children between the ages of 13 months and 9 years. Similarly, infant zinc supplementation has not been demonstrated to improve cognitive development. Nine randomized controlled trials have provided zinc to infants beginning before the age of 2 years for at least 6 months and evaluated cognitive and/or motor development. Four of these provided zinc with or without iron or other micronutrients147,163,–165 and one provided zinc with or without psychosocial stimulation.56 Only one trial showed a positive effect of zinc on mental development and this benefit was found only in children who also received psychosocial stimulation; in the group who did not receive stimulation, there was no difference between the zinc and placebo groups.56 One trial resulted in a negative effect of zinc supplementation on mental development compared to placebo.166 In these nine trials, positive effects on motor development were more commonly found. Four of the trials showed that zinc supplementation improved motor development,56,164,167,168 though one of these found an effect on the motor quality rating of the Bayley Behavior Rating Scale rather than on the Bayley Motor score,168 and another showed an impact of zinc only when given in combination with iron.164 In this latter study, iron and zinc together and iron and zinc in combination with other micronutrients, but not iron or zinc alone, affected motor development compared to placebo (riboflavin alone). Two other trials in India and Guatemala indicated that zinc supplementation in children under 2 years of age increased activity levels.169,170 The available evidence suggests that zinc supplementation during pregnancy does not seem to improve childhood cognitive or motor development. Zinc supplementation during infancy may positively affect motor development and activity levels, but it does not seem to affect early cognitive ability. A 2009 meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of zinc supplementation in infants did not find any evidence of impact on BSID mental or motor scores; however, the authors concluded that the number of available studies is still relatively small, and the duration of supplementation in these studies may be too short to permit detection of such effects.171 B-vitaminsLike zinc, B-vitamins, including thiamine, are important for brain development and function through many mechanisms. They play a role in carbohydrate metabolism (which helps to provide the brain's energy supply), membrane structure and function, and synapse formation and function.172 Neurological symptoms typically characterize thiamine-deficiency disorders. In high-income countries, thiamine deficiency in infants has become a rare condition since food has been enriched with thiamine. However, recent evidence suggests that the prevalence of thiamine deficiency may be relatively high in some low-income countries. Of 778 infants who were admitted to a hospital in Laos without clinical signs of thiamine deficiency, 13.4% showed biochemical signs of thiamine deficiency based on analysis of their blood.173 Moreover, a recent study in Israel demonstrated language deficits in 5–7-year-olds who had been fed a thiamine-deficient formula during infancy.88 When doctors discovered that a certain manufacturer had mistakenly stopped adding thiamine to its infant formula in early 2003, they monitored the development of infants who had been fed that formula as high-risk patients. These children showed impaired language ability compared to control children at 5 years of age, even though they had not displayed any neurological symptoms during infancy.88 The prevalence of thiamine deficiency and its effects on brain development require further research.59 Other observational studies have demonstrated associations between infant development and maternal niacin and vitamin B6 intake during pregnancy,174 maternal riboflavin, niacin, and vitamin B6 intake during lactation,175 and infant cobalamin and folate status.176 Although randomized trials of supplementation with B-vitamins alone have not been conducted, many studies of multiple micronutrient supplementation included B-vitamins, as discussed below. Multiple micronutrientsIndividuals who are deficient in one micronutrient are commonly at risk for deficiencies in others as well. Supplementation with any single micronutrient may not affect cognitive and motor development in individuals who are also deficient in other micronutrients. In these groups, supplementation with multiple micronutrients may be more beneficial than supplementation with a single micronutrient. The conversion of EFAs to DHA also depends on certain micronutrients and, thus, micronutrient deficiency may influence development through fatty acid status.177 Three randomized trials have reported positive effects of multiple micronutrient supplementation during pregnancy on child development between the ages of 6 and 18 months, including motor development in Bangladesh and Tanzania70,178 and cognitive development in China.143 A trial in Indonesia showed positive effects of maternal multiple micronutrient supplementation on motor and cognitive development at age 3.5 years in the children of undernourished and anemic mothers.71 In a fifth trial, 7–9-year-old children in Nepal whose mothers had received 15 micronutrients during pregnancy scored higher on a test of executive function than those whose mothers had received vitamin A alone.142 However, this benefit was found for only one of six tests of motor and cognitive function. As described above, children of mothers in this same study in Nepal who received iron, folic acid, and vitamin A scored higher than those whose mothers received vitamin A alone on five of six cognitive and motor tests. Studies of multiple micronutrient supplementation during infancy have shown some benefits immediately after the supplementation period. Three randomized trials in Ghana, China, and South Africa demonstrated positive effects on motor development in children between the ages of 12 and 18 months132,133,179 and one trial also showed an effect on the overall developmental quotient.133 In Mexico, infants between the ages of 8 and 12 months who had received multiple micronutrient supplementation for 4 months were more active than those who had not received supplementation.180 However, a randomized trial in Bangladesh did not show an effect on mental or motor development in infants who received 16 micronutrients compared to infants who received one or two micronutrients.164 Longer-term outcomes of these trials have not yet been reported. ConclusionWhen a child is adequately nourished from conception through infancy, the essential energy, protein, fatty acids, and micronutrients necessary for brain development are available during this foundational period, establishing the basis for lifetime brain function. The well-nourished child is also better able to interact with his or her caregivers and environment in a way that provides the experiences necessary for optimal brain development. Children who are not adequately nourished are at risk for failing to reach their developmental potential in cognitive, motor, and socioemotional abilities. These abilities are strongly linked to academic achievement and economic productivity. Therefore, preventing or reversing developmental losses in early childhood is crucial for fostering economic development in low- and middle-income countries as well as reducing economic disparities in high-income countries. The evidence is clear that the following conditions are key risk factors for poor motor, cognitive, and socioemotional development: severe acute malnutrition (very low weight for height), chronic undernutrition (as evidenced by intrauterine growth retardation and linear growth retardation or stunting), IDA, and iodine deficiency. Preventing these conditions should be a global health priority. The following interventions are examples of strategies that have been found to be effective in preventing or improving these conditions: salt iodization to prevent iodine deficiency,181 provision of iron via home fortification (e.g., with micronutrient powders) to prevent IDA,148 and educational interventions that include a strong emphasis on feeding nutrient-rich animal source foods, in conjunction with food supplementation in food-insecure populations.182 With the exception of a few studies on food supplementation (Table 2), direct evidence of the impact of these strategies on brain development is scarce. Strategies to promote exclusive breastfeeding during the first 6 months of life and continued breastfeeding thereafter, along with adequate complementary feeding, are also likely to improve cognitive development, though additional evidence for the effectiveness of these strategies is also needed.94 The following interventions are promising for preventing developmental loss: supplementation with iron and folic acid and/or multiple micronutrients during pregnancy, provision of multiple micronutrients (in addition to iron) during infancy, supplementation with essential fatty acids during pregnancy and infancy, fortified food supplements provided during pregnancy and infancy. However, additional robust research in low- and middle-income countries that evaluates the long-term effects of these interventions is needed. The design and interpretation of further research should take into account the factors discussed above: the timing of nutrient deficiency or supplementation, the degree of deficiency, the possibility of recovery, and the potential for additive, interacting, or mediating effects with regard to the children's experiential input from the environment. Interventions to improve the home environment and the quality of caregiver-infant interaction are also recommended to complement and enhance the effect of improved nutrition. These types of interventions are crucial to offset the negative effects of adverse environmental conditions (for example, poverty and low maternal education) that often coexist in populations in which undernutrition is common. Integrated strategies targeting multiple risk factors, including nutrition, are necessary to reduce inequality and promote cognitive, motor, and socioemotional development in disadvantaged children worldwide, ensuring that all children have the opportunity to fulfill their developmental potential. A previous version of sections of this paper was published as a technical brief by Alive & Thrive.59 Funding and SponsorshipThis publication is based on research funded by a grant to the University of California, Davis from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The findings and conclusions contained within are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect positions or policies of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Declaration of interestThe authors have no relevant interests to declare. References1 , et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries . Lancet. 2013 ; 382 : 427 – 451 . 2 . Early brain development and plasticity . In: , eds. The Blackwell Handbook of Early Childhood Development . Malden, MA : Blackwell Publsihing ; 2006 : 85 – 105 . 3 . Functional brain development in humans . Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 ; 2 : 475 – 483 . 4 . Myelination in the developing human brain . In: , eds. Handbook of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience . Cambridge, MA : MIT Press ; 2001 : 35 – 44 . 5 . Cell death during development of the nervous system . Annu Rev Neurosci. 1991 ; 14 : 453 – 501 . 6 . The role of nutrition in cognitive development . In: , ed. Handbook of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience , 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press ; 2008 : 623 – 641 . 7 , et al. Early alteration of structural and functional brain development in premature infants born with intrauterine growth restriction . Pediatr Res. 2004 ; 56 : 132 – 138 . 8 . The effect of severe early malnutrition on cellular growth of human brain . Pediatr Res. 1969 ; 3 : 181 – 184 . 9 , et al. Dendritic development in neocortex of infants with early postnatal life undernutrition . Pediatr Neurol. 1993 ; 9 : 457 – 464 . 10 , et al. Dendritic morphology and orientation of pyramidal cells of the neocortex in two groups of early postnatal undernourished-rehabilitated rats . Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 2003 ; 142 : 37 – 45 . 11 . The influence of protein restriction, rehabilitation and changing nutritional status on synaptic development: a quantitative study in rat brain . Brain Res 1981 ; 208 : 97 – 111 . 12 . Undernutrition and the development of brain neurotransmitter systems . Life Sciences. 1984 ; 35 : 2085 – 2094 . 13 , et al. Prenatal exposure to famine and brain morphology in schizophrenia . Am J Psychiatry. 2000 ; 157 : 1170 – 1172 . 14 , et al. Vulnerability of the fetal primate brain to moderate reduction in maternal global nutrient availability . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 ; 108 : 3011 – 3016 . 15 . Maternal dietary (n-3) fatty acid deficiency alters neurogenesis in the embryonic rat brain . J Nutr. 2006 ; 136 : 1570 – 1575 . 16 . Nutrition in brain development and aging: role of essential fatty acids . Nutr Rev. 2006 ; 64 ( Suppl ): S24 – S33 . discussion S72–91. 17 , et al. Effect of essential fatty acid deficiency on myelin proteins . Lipids. 1984 ; 19 : 478 – 480 . 18 . Effect of pre- and postnatal essential fatty acid deficiency on brain development and myelination . J Nutr. 1979 ; 109 : 1195 – 1204 . 19 , et al. Fetal and neonatal iron deficiency causes volume loss and alters the neurochemical profile of the adult rat hippocampus . Nutr Neurosci. 2011 ; 14 : 59 – 65 . 20 . Perinatal iron deficiency alters apical dendritic growth in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons . Dev Neurosci. 2003 ; 25 : 412 – 420 . 21 , et al. Fetal iron deficiency disrupts the maturation of synaptic function and efficacy in area CA1 of the developing rat hippocampus . Hippocampus. 2005 ; 15 : 1094 – 1102 . 22 . Iron status and neural functioning . Annu Rev Nutr. 2003 ; 23 : 41 – 58 . 23 . Recent evidence from human and animal studies regarding iron status and infant development . J Nutr. 2007 ; 137 ( Suppl ): 524S – 530S . 24 , et al. Chronic marginal iron intakes during early development in mice result in persistent changes in dopamine metabolism and myelin composition . J Nutr. 2000 ; 130 : 2821 – 2830 . 25 . Iodine deficiency and brain development in the first half of pregnancy . Public Health Nutr. 2007 ; 10 : 1554 – 1570 . 26 , et al. The iodine deficient rat . In: , eds. Iodine Deficiency Diseases and Congenital Hypothyroidism . Sao Paolo : Ache Press ; 1986 : 46 – 51 . 27 . Thyroid hormones and brain development . Annu Rev Physiol. 1987 ; 49 : 321 – 334 . 28 , et al. Morphologic study on cerebral cortex development in therapeutically aborted fetuses in an endemic goiter region in Guizhou . Chin Med J (Engl). 1984 ; 97 : 67 – 72 . 29 . W.O. Atwater memorial lecture. Zinc: essentiality for brain development and function . Nutr Rev. 1985 ; 43 : 129 – 137 . 30 , et al. Zinc: health effects and research priorities for the 1990s . Environ Health Perspect. 1994 ; 2 : 5 – 46 . 31 . The impaired growth induced by zinc deficiency in rats is associated with decreased expression of the hepatic insulin-like growth factor I and growth hormone receptor genes . J Nutr. 1995 ; 125 : 874 – 879 . 32 , et al. Imprinting of hippocampal metabolism of choline by its availability during gestation: implications for cholinergic neurotransmission . J Physiol Paris. 1998 ; 92 : 199 – 203 . 33 , et al. Maternal vitamin B12 status and risk of neural tube defects in a population with high neural tube defect prevalence and no folic acid fortification . Pediatrics. 2009 ; 123 : 917 – 923 . 34 . Effects of vitamin B6 deficiency on morphological changes in dendritic trees in Purkinje cells in developing cerebellum in rats . J Nutr. 1981 ; 111 : 848 – 857 . 35 . Effects of maternal restriction of vitamin B6 on neocortex development in rats: neuron differentiation and synaptogenesis . J Nutr. 1990 ; 120 : 485 – 492 . 36 . Vitamin B6 and cognitive development: recent research findings from human and animal studies . Nutr Rev. 1993 ; 51 : 193 – 198 . 37 . Effects of perinatal vitamin B6 deficiency on dopaminergic neurochemistry . J Neurochem. 1987 ; 48 : 432 – 439 . 38 . Effects of vitamin B6 deficiency on the developing central nervous system of the rat. Myelination . J Nutr. 1978 ; 108 : 1260 – 1265 . 39 . Brain plasticity and behavior . Annu Rev Psychol. 1998 ; 49 : 43 – 64 . 40 . A quantitative dendritic analysis of Wernicke's area in humans. II. Gender, hemispheric, and environmental factors . J Comp Neurol. 1993 ; 327 : 97 – 111 . 41 . Induction of brain structure by experience: substrates for cognitive development . In: , eds. Developmental Behavioral Neuroscience . Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum ; 1992 : 155 – 200 .
42 , et al. Abnormal brain connectivity in children after early severe socioemotional deprivation: a diffusion tensor imaging study . Pediatrics. 2006 ; 117 : 2093 – 2100 . 43 , et al. Extensive piano practicing has regionally specific effects on white matter development . Nat Neurosci. 2005 ; 8 : 1148 – 1150 . 44 . Sex and environmental influences on the size and ultrastructure of the rat corpus callosum . Brain Res. 1988 ; 450 : 1 – 8 . 45 , et al. Differential rearing affects corpus callosum size and cognitive function of rhesus monkeys . Brain Res. 1998 ; 812 : 38 – 49 . 46 , et al. Modeling transformations of neurodevelopmental sequences across mammalian species . J Neurosci. 2013 ; 33 : 7368 – 7383 . 47 . Acquiring “the Knowledge” of London's layout drives structural brain changes . Curr Biol. 2011 ; 21 : 2109 – 2114 . 48 . A neurobiological perspective on early human deprivation . Child Dev Perspect. 2007 ; 1 : 13 – 18 . 49 , et al. Nutritional supplementation, psychosocial stimulation, and mental development of stunted children: the Jamaican Study . Lancet. 1991 ; 338 : 1 – 5 . 50 , et al. Nutritional supplementation, maternal education, and cognitive development of infants at risk of malnutrition . Am J Clin Nutr. 1981 ; 34 ( Suppl 4 ): 807 – 813 . 51 . Double burden of iron deficiency in infancy and low socioeconomic status: a longitudinal analysis of cognitive test scores to age 19 years . Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 ; 160 : 1108 – 1113 . 52 . The effect of birthweight on childhood cognitive development in a middle-income country . Int J Epidemiol. 2011 ; 40 : 1008 – 1018 . 53 , et al. Early childhood development interventions and cognitive development of young children in rural Vietnam . J Nutr. 2005 ; 135 : 1918 – 1925 . 54 . Early supplementary feeding and cognition: effects over two decades . Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1993 ; 58 : 1 – 99 . 55 , et al. Home intervention improves cognitive and social-emotional scores in iron-deficient anemic infants . Pediatrics. 2010 ; 126 : e884 – e894 . 56 , et al. Zinc supplementation and psychosocial stimulation: effects on the development of undernourished Jamaican children . Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 ; 82 : 399 – 405 . 57 , et al. Prenatal choline availability modulates hippocampal neurogenesis and neurogenic responses to enriching experiences in adult female rats . Eur J Neurosci. 2007 ; 25 : 2473 – 2482 . 58 . Nutrition and environmental interactions in the behavioural development of the rat: long-term effects . Science. 1972 ; 176 : 68 – 71 . 59 . Nutrition and brain development in early life . Alive & Thrive Technical Brief January 2012 ; (Issue 4). 60 , et al. Behavior of infants with iron-deficiency anemia . Child Dev. 1998 ; 69 : 25 – 36 . 61 . Iron deficiency in infancy and mother-child interaction at 5 years . J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2006 ; 27 : 371 – 378 . 62 , et al. Activity and behavioral development in stunted and nonstunted children and response to nutritional supplemenation . Child Dev. 1995 ; 66 : 1785 – 1797 . 63 . Time course of axonal myelination in the human brainstem auditory pathway . Hear Res. 1995 ; 87 : 21 – 31 . 64 . Model-based analysis and quantification of age trends in auditory evoked potentials . Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 ; 122 : 134 – 147 . 65 , et al. Nutritional effects on auditory brainstem maturation in healthy term infants . Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 ; 89 : F177 – F179 . 66 . Nutrition and the developing brain: nutrient priorities and measurement . Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 ; 85 (Suppl): 614S – 620S . 67 , et al. Issues in the timing of integrated early interventions: contributions from nutrition, neuroscience and psychological research . Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013 ;doi: 10.1111/nyas.12314. 68 . Sheep models of intrauterine growth restriction: fetal adaptations and consequences . Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2008 ; 35 : 730 – 743 . 69 , et al. Maternal iron status influences iron transfer to the fetus during the third trimester of pregnancy . Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 ; 77 : 924 – 930 . 70 , et al. Effects of prenatal food and micronutrient supplementation on infant development: a randomized trial from the Maternal and Infant Nutrition Interventions, Matlab (MINIMat) study . Am J Clin Nutr 2008 ; 87 : 704 – 711 . 71 , et al. Maternal multiple micronutrient supplements and child cognition: a randomized trial in Indonesia . Pediatrics. 2012 ; 130 : e536 – e546 . 72 , et al. Iron-fortified vs low-iron infant formula: developmental outcome at 10 years . Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 ; 166 : 208 – 215 . 73 . Early brain injury, plasticity, and behavior . In: , eds. Handbook of Developmental Neuroscience . Cambridge, MA : MIT Press ; 2001 : 175 – 190 . 74 . Malnutrition and environmental enrichment by early adoption . Science. 1975 ; 190 : 1173 – 1175 . 75 . Early malnutrition and “late” adoption: a study of their effects on the development of Korean orphans adopted into American families . Am J Clin Nutr. 1977 ; 30 : 1734 – 1739 . 76 , et al. Famine and Human Development: The Dutch Hunger Winter of 1944/45 . New York : Oxford University Press ; 1975 . 77 . Neurodevelopmental disorders after prenatal famine: the story of the Dutch famine study . Am J Epidemiol. 1998 ; 147 : 213 – 216 . 78 . Prenatal exposure to wartime famine and development of antisocial personality disorder in early adulthood . JAMA. 1999 ; 282 : 455 – 462 . 79 , et al. Prenatal exposure to the 1944–45 Dutch “hunger winter” and addiction later in life . Addiction. 2008 ; 103 : 433 – 438 . 80 , et al. Children who recover from early stunting and children who are not stunted demonstrate similar levels of cognition . J Nutr. 2010 ; 140 : 1996 – 2001 . 81 , et al. Strategies for reducing inequalities and improving developmental outcomes for young children in low-income and middle-income countries . Lancet. 2011 ; 378 : 1339 – 1353 . 82 , et al. Guidelines for the Inpatient Treatment of Severely Malnourished Children . Geneva : World Health Organization ; 2003 . 83 . The assessment of cognitive performance in children: considerations for detecting nutritional influences . Nutr Rev. 2003 ; 61 : 413 – 422 . 84 . Nutrition and cognition: assessing cognitive abilities in children and young people . Eur J Nutr. 2008 ; 47 ( Suppl 3 ): 4 – 24 . 85 , et al. Long-term effects of LCPUFA supplementation on childhood cognitive outcomes . Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 ; 98 : 403 – 412 . 86 . You can't take it with you: why ability assessments don't cross cultures . Am Psychol. 1997 ; 52 : 1115 – 1124 . 87 , et al. The development of 3- to 9-month-old infants in two cultural contexts: Bayley longitudinal results for Cameroonian and German infants . Eur J Dev Psychol. 2011 ; 8 : 349 – 366 . 88 . The crucial role of thiamine in the development of syntax and lexical retrieval: a study of infantile thiamine deficiency . Brain. 2011 ; 134 ( Pt 6 ): 1720 – 1739 . 89 . A review of studies of the effect of severe malnutrition on mental development . J Nutr. 1995 ; 125 ( Suppl 8 ): 2233S – 2238S . 90 , et al. Infant malnutrition is associated with persisting attention deficits in middle adulthood . J Nutr. 2012 ; 142 : 788 – 794 . 91 , et al. Socioeconomic outcomes in adults malnourished in the first year of life: a 40-year study . Pediatrics. 2012 ; 130 : e1 – e7 . 92 . Review of evidence linking protein and energy to mental development . Public Health Nutr. 2005 ; 8 ( 7A ): 1191 – 1201 . 93 . Effects of being born small for gestational age on long-term intellectual performance . Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 ; 22 : 477 – 488 . 94 , et al. Inequality in early childhood: risk and protective factors for early child development . Lancet. 2011 ; 378 : 1325 – 1338 . 95 , et al. Low birth weight, prematurity, and paternal social status: impact on the basic competence test in Taiwanese adolescents . J Pediatr. 2008 ; 153 : 333 – 338 . 96 , et al. The effect of psychosocial stimulation on cognition and behaviour at 6 years in a cohort of term, low-birthweight Jamaican children . Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010 ; 52 : e148 – e154 . 97 , et al. Development and behaviour of low-birthweight term infants at 8 years in northeast Brazil: a longitudinal study . Acta Paediatr. 2006 ; 95 : 1249 – 1257 . 98 , et al. Low birthweight and subsequent emotional and behavioural outcomes in 12-year-old children in Soweto, South Africa: findings from Birth to Twenty . Int J Epidemiol. 2009 ; 38 : 944 – 954 . 99 . Growth and development of term children born with low birth weight: effects of genetic and environmental factors . J Pediatr. 1998 ; 133 : 67 – 72 . 100 , et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome in children with intrauterine growth retardation: a 3-year follow-up . J Child Neurol. 1999 ; 14 : 724 – 727 . 101 , et al. Effects of early childhood supplementation on the educational achievement of women . Pediatrics. 2003 ; 112 : 1156 – 1162 . 102 , et al. Effect of a nutrition intervention during early childhood on economic productivity in Guatemalan adults . Lancet. 2008 ; 371 : 411 – 416 . 103 . The behavioral consequences of protein-energy deprivation and supplementation in early life: an epidemiological perspective . In: , ed. Human Nutrition: A Comprehensive Treatise . New York/London : Plenum Press ; 1984 : 119 – 154 . 104 , et al. The Bacon Chow study: maternal nutritional supplementation and infant behavioral development . Child Dev. 1983 ; 54 : 669 – 676 . 105 . Maternal dietary supplementation and 5 year old Stanford Binet IQ test on the offspring in Taiwan . Fed Proc. 1981 ; 40 : 897 . 106 . Cognitive outcomes of early nutritional intervention in the Bogota study . Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA. 1991 . 107 , et al. Developmental effects of short-term supplementary feeding in nutritionally at-risk Indonesian infants . Am J Clin Nutr. 1991 ; 54 : 799 – 804 . 108 . Three-month nutritional supplementation in Indonesian infants and toddlers benefits memory function 8 y later . Am J Clin Nutr 1997 ; 66 : 1357 – 1363 . 109 , et al. Effects of an energy and micronutrient supplement on mental development and behavior under natural conditions in undernourished children in Indonesia . Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000 ; 54 ( Suppl ): S80 – S90 . 110 , et al. Effects of an energy and micronutrient supplement on growth and activity, correcting for non-supplemental sources of energy input in undernourished children in Indonesia . Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000 ; 54 ( Suppl ): S69 – S73 . 111 , et al. Effects of early childhood supplementation with and without stimulation on later development in stunted Jamaican children . Am J Clin Nutr. 1997 ; 66 : 247 – 253 . 112 , et al. Effects of stunting in early childhood on growth, IQ and cognition at age 11–12 years and the benefits of nutritional supplementation and psychological stimulation . J Pediatr. 2000 ; 137 : 36 – 41 . 113 , et al. Effects of early childhood psychosocial stimulation and nutritional supplementation on cognition and education in growth-stunted Jamaican children: prospective cohort study . Lancet. 2005 ; 366 : 1804 – 1807 . 114 , et al. Early childhood stunting is associated with poor psychological functioning in late adolescence and effects are reduced by psychosocial stimulation . J Nutr. 2007 ; 137 : 2464 – 2469 . 115 . Human milk and formula fatty acids . J Pediatr. 1992 ; 120 ( 4 Pt 2 ): S56 – S61 . 116 , et al. Oligosaccharides in human milk: structural, functional, and metabolic aspects . Annu Rev Nutr. 2000 ; 20 : 699 – 722 . 117 . Choline: needed for normal development of memory . J Am Coll Nutr. 2000 ; 19 ( Suppl 5 ): 528S – 531S . 118 . Breastfeeding and brain development . Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001 ; 48 : 159 – 171 . 119 . How good is the evidence linking breastfeeding and intelligence? Pediatrics. 2002 ; 109 : 1044 – 1053 . 120 . Breast-feeding and cognitive development: a meta-analysis . Am J Clin Nutr. 1999 ; 70 : 525 – 535 . 121 . A critical evaluation of the evidence on the association between type of infant feeding and cognitive development . Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2000 ; 14 : 349 – 356 . 122 , et al. Breast milk and cognitive development – the role of confounders: a systematic review . BMJ Open. 2013 ; 3 : e003259 . 123 . Effect of breast feeding on intelligence in children: prospective study, sibling pairs analysis, and meta-analysis . BMJ. 2006 ; 333 : 945 – 949 . 124 , et al. Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries . Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) 2007 ; 153 : 1 – 186 . 125 . Breast-feeding influences cognitive development in Filipino children . J Nutr. 2005 ; 135 : 2589 – 2595 . 126 , et al. Breastfeeding and school achievement in Brazilian adolescents . Acta Paediatr. 2005 ; 94 : 1656 – 1660 . 127 , et al. What are the causal effects of breastfeeding on IQ, obesity and blood pressure? Evidence from comparing high-income with middle-income cohorts . Int J Epidemiol. 2011 ; 40 : 670 – 680 . 128 , et al. Breastfeeding and child cognitive development: new evidence from a large randomized trial . Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 ; 65 : 578 – 584 . 129 . Impact of fatty acid status on growth and neurobehavioural development in humans . Matern Child Nutr. 2011 ; 7 ( Suppl 2 ): 80 – 88 . 130 , et al. Meta-analysis of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation of formula and infant cognition . Pediatrics. 2012 ; 129 : 1141 – 1149 . 131 . Developmental profiles of polyunsaturated fatty acids in the brain of normal infants and patients with peroxisomal diseases: severe deficiency of docosahexaenoic acid in Zellweger's and pseudo-Zellweger's syndromes . World Rev Nutr Diet. 1991 ; 66 : 87 – 102 . 132 , et al. Randomized comparison of 3 types of micronutrient supplements for home fortification of complementary foods in Ghana: effects on growth and motor development . Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 ; 86 : 412 – 420 . 133 , et al. Effects of nutrient fortified complementary food supplements on development of infants and young children in poor rural area of Gansu Province . Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2006 ; 35 : 772 – 774 . 134 , et al. Long-chain PUFA supplementation in rural African infants: a randomized controlled trial of effects on gut integrity, growth, and cognitive development . Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 ; 97 : 45 – 57 . 135 , et al. Developmental outcomes among 18-month-old Malawians after a year of complementary feeding with lipid-based nutrient supplements or corn-soy flour . Matern Child Nutr. 2012 ; 8 : 239 – 248 . 136 . The effect of maternal omega-3 (n-3) LCPUFA supplementation during pregnancy on early childhood cognitive and visual development: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials . Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 ; 97 : 531 – 544 . 137 World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Worldwide Prevalence of Anaemia 1993–2005. WHO Global Database on Anaemia . Geneva : World Health Organization ; 2008 . 138 , et al. International Zinc Nutrition Consultative Group (IZiNCG) technical document #1. Assessment of the risk of zinc deficiency in populations and options for its control . Food Nutr Bull. 2004 ; 25 ( Suppl 2 ): S99 – 203 . 139 , et al. Iodine deficiency in 2007: global progress since 2003 . Food Nutr Bull. 2008 ; 29 : 195 – 202 . 140 , et al. Long-lasting neural and behavioral effects of iron deficiency in infancy . Nutr Rev. 2006 ; 64 ( Suppl ): S34 – S43 . 141 , et al. Child development: risk factors for adverse outcomes in developing countries . Lancet. 2007 ; 369 : 145 – 157 . 142 , et al. Prenatal micronutrient supplementation and intellectual and motor function in early school-aged children in Nepal . JAMA. 2010 ; 304 : 2716 – 2723 . 143 , et al. Effects of maternal micronutrient supplementation on the mental development of infants in rural western China: follow-up evaluation of a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial . Pediatrics. 2009 ; 123 : e685 – e692 . 144 , et al. Effect of iron supplementation during pregnancy on the intelligence quotient and behavior of children at 4 y of age: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial . Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 ; 83 : 1112 – 1117 . 145 , et al. Effects of iron supplementation of LBW infants on cognition and behavior at 3 years . Pediatrics. 2013 ; 131 : 47 – 55 . 146 , et al. Preschool iron-folic acid and zinc supplementation in children exposed to iron-folic acid in utero confers no added cognitive benefit in early school-age . J Nutr. 2011 ; 141 : 2042 – 2048 . 147 , et al. Preschool micronutrient supplementation effects on intellectual and motor function in school-aged Nepalese children . Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 ; 166 : 404 – 410 . 148 World Health Organization . Guideline: Use of Multiple Micronutrient Powders for Home Fortification of Foods Consumed by Infants and Children 6–23 Months of Age . Geneva : World Health Organization ; 2011 . 149 . Session 4: mineral metabolism and body composition iron status of breast-fed infants . Proc Nutr Soc. 2007 ; 66 : 412 – 422 . 150 , et al. Iron deficiency and iron-deficiency anemia in the first two years of life: strategies to prevent loss of developmental potential . Nutr Rev. 2011 ; 69 ( Suppl 1 ): S64 – S70 . 151 . Neurological damage to the fetus resulting from severe iodine deficiency during pregnancy . Lancet. 1971 ; 1 : 308 – 310 . 152 . A metaanalysis of research on iodine and its relationship to cognitive development . In: , ed. The Damaged Brain of Iodine Deficiency . New York : Cognizant Communication Corporation ; 1994 : 195 – 200 . 153 , et al. The effects of iodine on intelligence in children: a meta-analysis of studies conducted in China . Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2005 ; 14 : 32 – 42 . 154 . Iodine deficiency in pregnancy, infancy and childhood and its consequences for brain development . Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 ; 24 : 29 – 38 . 155
, et al. Effects of iodine supplementation during pregnancy on child growth and development at school age . Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002 ; 44 : 76 – 81 . 156 , et al. Effect of inadequate iodine status in UK pregnant women on cognitive outcomes in their children: results from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) . Lancet. 2013 ; 382 : 331 – 337 . 157 , et al. Iodine and mental development of children 5 years old and under: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Nutrients. 2013 ; 5 : 1384 – 1416 . 158 . History of zinc as related to brain function . J Nutr. 2000 ; 130 ( Suppl 2 ): 496S – 502S . 159 , et al. Developmental zinc deficiency and behavior . J Nutr. 1995 ; 125 ( Suppl 8 ): 2263S – 2271S . 160 , et al. Maternal gestational zinc supplementation does not influence multiple aspects of child development at 54 mo of age in Peru . Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 ; 92 : 130 – 136 . 161 , et al. Folate status of mothers during pregnancy and mental and psychomotor development of their children at five years of age . Pediatrics. 2005 ; 116 : 703 – 708 . 162 , et al. Zinc supplementation during pregnancy and effects on mental development and behavior of infants: a follow up study . Lancet. 2002 ; 360 : 290 – 294 . 163 , et al. A community-based randomized controlled trial of iron and zinc supplementation in Indonesian infants: effects on growth and development . Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 ; 80 : 729 – 736 . 164 , et al. Iron and zinc supplementation promote motor development and exploratory behavior among Bangladesh infants . Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 ; 80 : 903 – 910 . 165 , et al. Daily supplementation with iron plus folic acid, zinc, and their combination is not associated with younger age at first walking unassisted in malnourished preschool children from a deficient population in rural Nepal . J Nutr. 2010 ; 140 : 1317 – 1321 . 166 , et al. Randomized controlled trial of the effect of zinc supplementation on the mental development of Bangladeshi infants . Am J Clin Nutr. 2001 ; 74 : 381 – 386 . 167 , et al. Zinc supplementation in very-low-birth-weight infants . J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1993 ; 17 : 97 – 104 . 168 , et al. Effect of zinc supplementation on development and growth of Chilean infants . J Pediatr. 2001 ; 138 : 229 – 235 . 169 , et al. Effect of zinc supplementation on observed activity in low socioeconomic Indian preschool children . Pediatrics. 1996 ; 98 : 1132 – 1137 . 170 , et al. Zinc supplementation affects the activity patterns of rural Guatemalan infants . J Nutr. 1997 ; 127 : 1333 – 1338 . 171 , et al. Preventive zinc supplementation among infants, preschoolers, and older prepubertal children . Food Nutr Bull. 2009 ; 30 ( Suppl 1 ): S12 – S40 . 172 . Thiamin deficiency and brain disorders . Nutr Res Rev. 2003 ; 16 : 277 – 283 . 173 , et al. Clinically unapparent infantile thiamin deficiency in Vientiane, Laos . PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 ; 5 : e969 . 174 , et al. Relation of maternal zinc nutriture to pregnancy outcome and infant development in an Egyptian village . Am J Clin Nutr. 1994 ; 60 : 782 – 792 . 175 , et al. Diet during lactation associated with infant behavior and caregiver-infant interaction in a semirural Egyptian village . J Nutr. 1993 ; 123 : 164 – 175 . 176 , et al. Cobalamin and folate status predicts mental development scores in North Indian children 12–18 mo of age . Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 ; 97 : 310 – 317 . 177 , et al. Essential fats: how do they affect growth and development of infants and young children in developing countries? A literature review . Matern Child Nutr. 2011 ; 7 ( Suppl 3 ): 44 – 65 . 178 , et al. Effect of maternal multivitamin supplementation on the mental and psychomotor development of children who are born to HIV-1-infected mothers in Tanzania . Pediatrics. 2006 ; 117 : e216 – e225 . 179 , et al. Effect of a fortified maize-meal porridge on anemia, micronutrient status, and motor development of infants . Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 ; 82 : 1032 – 1039 . 180 , et al. The effect of nutritional supplementation on physical activity and exploratory behavior of Mexican infants aged 8–12 months . Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010 ; 64 : 644 – 651 . 181 . Risks of iodine-induced hyperthyroidism after correction of iodine deficiency by iodized salt . Thyroid. 1999 ; 9 : 545 – 556 . 182 . Systematic review of the efficacy and effectiveness of complementary feeding interventions in developing countries . Matern Child Nutr. 2008 ; 4 ( Suppl 1 ): 24 – 85 . © 2014 International Life Sciences Institute This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact © 2014 International Life Sciences Institute Topic:
Where is brain growth most rapid from ages 3 6?During early childhood (ages 3–6), the frontal lobes grow rapidly. Recalling our discussion of the 4 lobes of the brain earlier in this book, the frontal lobes are associated with planning, reasoning, memory, and impulse control.
Which of the following best describes the pattern of brain development in early childhood?Terms in this set (37)
Which of the following best describes the pattern of brain growth in childhood? The brain grows in spurts wiht the weight of the brain increasing by 30% between the ages of 3 and 18 months.
When has the brains developmental process generally concluded?Brain development is a protracted process that begins about 2 weeks after conception and continues into young adulthood 20 years later.
In which of Piaget's stages does the child become capable of understanding conservation?The concrete operational phase centers around three elements : Conservation and reversibility: Conservation the understanding that objects can change in size, volume, or appearance but essentially remain the same.
|