What are the relationships between job performance job satisfaction and motivation?

journal article

Relationship between Job Satisfaction & Job Performance: a Meta-analysis

Indian Journal of Industrial Relations

Vol. 48, No. 2 (October 2012)

, pp. 290-305 (16 pages)

Published By: Shri Ram Centre for Industrial Relations and Human Resources

https://www.jstor.org/stable/23509839

Abstract

Studies suggest that there is a significant relationship between job satisfaction and job performance. A meta-analysis of 48 correlations produces a mean correlation of the order (ρ = 0.30 approx.). However, the moderator variables viz., foreign studies vs. Indian studies, occupation—type vs. scale of measurement for job satisfaction affect the magnitude of the relationship between job satisfaction and job performance. This study shows that to obtain a valid estimate of mean correlation and true variance, we must correct correlation coefficients for the measurement errors.

Journal Information

The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: A Review of Economic and Social Development (IJIR) is devoted to dissemination of knowledge for effective management of human resources and harmonious industrial elations. A quarterly in English, the journal enjoys high academic reputation in India and elsewhere and is widely subscribed by government institutions, universities and private sector organizations. A refereed journal its readership consists of academic scholars, policy makers, practicing managers and student community. Salient Features: In to its 46th year of uninterrupted publication and up to date Listed in EBSCO, GALE/CENGAGE Learning, Proquest/CSA Data Bases Research based articles and communications from eminent persons Reviews of latest titles form India and elsewhere Theme based special issue program with eminent persons as Guest Ed

Publisher Information

Indian Journal of Industrial Relations is published by The Shri Ram Centre for Industrial Relations & Human Resources, a premier organization in research, training/seminars and publications. The Centre's efforts in the last forty-five years have helped in bridging the gap that exists between the practitioners and social scientists. It has earned a name for itself in India and abroad. The Centre has completed over 175 research projects, conducted over 3000 training programs and published over 65 titles based on its own research studies. The research projects have been sponsored by the Government departments, public sector undertakings, industrial companies and international organizations. Research studies and workshops have been taken up by the Centre to strengthen Grass Root Democracy's contribution to health and education, as well as women and labour, both in the organized and unorganized sectors.

A study carried out in 2015 by Professor Andrew J. Oswald from the University of Warwick revealed that happiness at work can increase productivity by at least 12%.

In turn, these internal emotional states guide individual's positive or negative evaluative responses to both their jobs and workplace. To this extent, job satisfaction can be regarded as the 'pains' and 'pleasures' associated with individuals' job experiences at the workplace. It essentially involves both job satisfaction and dissatisfaction. 

Job satisfaction can increase productivity.

Many employers have started to recognise that a “happier” employee is more motivated and tend to perform better at the workplace. A study carried out in 2015 by Professor Andrew J. Oswald from the University of Warwick revealed that happiness at work can increase productivity by at least 12%. In this study there were three groups of individuals, whereby two groups were shown either comedy or neutral movie clips, and one group was given fruit, chocolates, and bottled drinks prior to complete a task. Productivity was measured by asking individuals to perform numeral additions of five 2-digit numbers during a 10-minute period. Correct answers were paid at a rate of 0.25 pounds sterling. Results revealed that performance was linked to happiness, particularly for the group that watched comedy clips.

Given these results, Professor Oswald made a case for a causal link between human well-being and human performance, particularly performance at the workplace. Obviously, there are factors which could mediate this relationship (i.e. salary, working environment, job benefits). However, being satisfied at work seems to be a key ingredient for increasing performance at the workplace, as well raising organisation’s overall productivity.

Several factors underlie job satisfaction/dissatisfaction and allow us to derive key benefits of satisfaction.

Employee satisfaction can bring a lot of benefits to organisations. For example, it can reduce task errors, minimise conflicts at work, and increase the business turnover and profitability. But why is this the case? Let us start by analysing the factors underlying job satisfaction at the workplace. An employee’s satisfaction or dissatisfaction with his/her job can be the result of a combination of several factors. These may include salary and benefits, career development opportunities, relationships with co-workers, etc. Similarly, job satisfaction is also achieved through fulfilling a wide range of worker’s needs. For example, if we adapt Maslow’s hierarchy of needs to an Organisational context, workers would normally seek fulfilment of external necessities such as food, water, safety, security, housing, job security, pension, and medical care.

These key incentives must implemented by employers in order to supply employees with satisfactory benefits package. Additionally, job satisfaction can also be a product of the worker building a gradual sense of belonging to the institution where he/she works. This sense of community and acceptance at the workplace helps the worker to feel associated with both his/her work assignment and the organisation. But ultimately, happy and satisfied employees make a successful organisation.

What are the negative factors affecting job satisfaction?

We must realise that not all rules are written in a contract, and employees may expect things that were not necessarily discussed during employment negotiations. When it comes to identifying negative issues associated with employee dissatisfaction, two factors stand out the most. Firstly, one of the most common negative factors is poor communication. When communication between managers, supervisors, and co-workers deteriorates it puts the organization’s success in jeopardy, and strains relations at work. In this way, in order to promote effective communication between supervisors, management, and employees it is important to cultivate working environments which both promote a sense of fun outside daily organisational activities, and encourages treatment of people with respect and trust. In practical terms, this would involve managers engaging with their employees in problem resolution, goal setting, day-to-day operations, and decision making.

A lack of empowerment has a negative impact on job satisfaction.

Secondly, the feeling of lack of empowerment in at the workplace is also a ‘usual suspect’ when it comes to creating job dissatisfaction. In 2013, a study carried out by Dr. Sergio Fernandez from Indiana University found a positive relationship between job satisfaction and empowering employees with information about performance and goals. However, Dr. Fernandez also explained that empowering employees by offering them with rewards does not have an effect on job satisfaction, particularly when performance is defined in terms of outcomes and outputs. So far, managers, supervisors, and key stakeholders should foster both empowerment and good and effective communication at all levels within organisational settings.

Management skills newsletter

Join our monthly newsletter to receive management tips, tricks and insights directly into your inbox!

Satisfaction and motivation are inter-dependent and inter-linked.

People spend a large part of their life at work and understanding what makes them happy at the workplace is crucial. As previously mentioned, factors affecting job satisfaction also have both positive and negative effects on customer satisfaction, and ultimately on business profitability. But is equally important to understand what drives their satisfaction and what motivates employee’s actions and behaviour within organisational settings. Alongside our understanding of job satisfaction, we must also get an insight into how motivated individuals are at the workplace. We could argue that employee satisfaction and motivation are two important factors contributing towards the success of any organisation.

However, these two concepts can be easily misinterpreted and confusing. Quite often managers are led to believe that employee satisfaction is the drive behind action and behaviour at the workplace. They may also have the tendency to regard motivation as the product of the employee being happy within the working environment. Although in most cases job satisfaction increases motivation, in actual fact, the relationship between the two is a bit more complex. Both satisfactions and dissatisfactions about one’s job can also strengthen employee motivation.

Two different types of motivation can be distinguished.

Put simply, when looking at employee motivation we can identify at least two broad types of individuals; (1) the employee who is self-motivated, and (2) and the employee whose motivation is dependent on external aspects of the workplace and job. A study published in 2015, in the Journal of Management and Organizational Studies shows that workers who are self-motivated are more likely to be satisfied with their jobs. These results are an indication that motivation is not always a product of job satisfaction, but it can also be its cause. Therefore, gaining some depth of insight into the dynamics of motivation can also help managers identify ways in which they can promote self-motivation among workers, and in this way increase employee performance in the workplace, minimise absenteeism, and ultimately maximise the organisation’s profitability.

So far, we have talked about how happiness at the workplace is a key to organisational success. We have also had a look into how organisations can benefit from increasing job satisfaction, and minimize negative factors responsible for reducing employee satisfaction. The counterintuitive link between job satisfaction and motivation was also explored. So how do we tie this all up to create highly motivated and satisfied workers? It should be evident that the place where people work and spend most part of their daytime has a strong impact on their feelings, actions and thoughts. As a natural consequence of this there is a growing responsibility among managers to understand worker’s degree of motivation and how happy and fulfilled they are with their jobs. Recent evidence-based leadership theories and approaches put a strong emphasis on how to increase motivation and job satisfication.

When creating jobs and conditions that satisfy employees it is important to better understand what factors promote and influence job satisfaction and motivation. Similarly, when seeking their ideal worker, managers must both create fulfilling working environments and adopt the right motivational strategies, such as motivational interviewing. In practical terms this means creating new and more adjustable corporate policies, and gaining insights into employee motivations (i.e. self- and externally motivated). Additionally, managers must also have a good grasp of their organisation’s specific performance needs, in order to employ motivational processes suitable for the type of workers at that institution. Furthermore, organisational policy makers and leaders in general should structure jobs in order to give self-motivated workers a chance to express their need autonomy and competitiveness. A ‘one-policy-for-all’ approach can prove to be challenging, and in most cases can result in employee burn out, or voluntarily quitting the organisation.

Tags:Employee engagement, Leadership, Motivation

What is the relationship between motivation performance and job satisfaction?

The results show a positive correlation between motivation and job satisfaction i.e., motivation increases with increase in job satisfaction and vice-versa. The results of the study also indicate that, motivation remains unaffected of both age as well as the length of the service of the employees.

What is the relationship between motivation and performance management?

Research shows that a highly motivated employee has a higher level of employee performance while the opposite is true. To improve performance your human resource department must find creative ways to keep people motivated in the workplace.

What is the relationship between employee job satisfaction and organizational performance?

It notes that job satisfaction is vital for improved organizational performances. The paper posits that an employee with a high level of job satisfaction holds positive attitudes towards his job. On the contrary, an employee who is dissatisfied with his job holds negative attitudes about the job.

What is the relationship between job satisfaction and job performance quizlet?

Job satisfaction has a moderate positive relationship with job performance and a strong positive relationship with organizational commitment. It also has a strong positive relationship with life satisfaction.