So sánh gtx 950m và gtx1050 năm 2024
|
Tên GPU GP107 GM107 Phiên bản GPU GP107-300-A1 N16P-GT Kiến trúc Pascal Maxwell Nhà sản xuất Samsung TSMC Kích thước tiến trình 14 nm 28 nm Bóng bán dẫn 3,300 million 1,870 million Kích thước chết 132 mm² 148 mm² Show
Card đồ hoạNgày phát hành Oct 25th, 2016 — Thế hệ GeForce 10 — Tiền nhiệm GeForce 900 — Kế vị GeForce 20 — Sản xuất End-of-life — Giá ra mắt 109 USD — Giao diện Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 — Đánh giá 15 in our database — Tốc độ xung nhịpXung nhịp cơ bản 1354 MHz 993 MHz Tăng xung nhịp 1455 MHz 1124 MHz xung nhịp bộ nhớ 1752 MHz 7 Gbps effective 900 MHz 1800 Mbps effective Kích thước bộ nhớ 2 GB 4 GB Loại bộ nhớ GDDR5 DDR3 Bộ nhớ Bus 128 bit 128 bit Băng thông 112.1 GB/s 28.80 GB/s cấu hình kết xuấtCác đơn vị bóng 640 640 Đơn vị xử lý bề mặt 40 40 ROPs 32 16 Số lượng SM 5 — Bộ nhớ đệm L1 48 KB (per SM) 64 KB (per SMM) Bộ nhớ đệm L2 1024 KB 2 MB Số lượng SMM — 5 Hiệu năng lý thuyếtTỷ lệ điểm ảnh 46.56 GPixel/s 17.98 GPixel/s Tốc độ làm đầy vật liệu 58.20 GTexel/s 44.96 GTexel/s FP16 (half) hiệu năng 29.10 GFLOPS (1:64) — FP32 (float) hiệu năng 1.862 TFLOPS 1,439 GFLOPS FP64 (double) hiệu năng 58.20 GFLOPS (1:32) 44.96 GFLOPS (1:32) Thiết kế bảng mạchChiều rộng khe Dual-slot IGP Chiều dài 145 mm 5.7 inches — Chiều rộng 111 mm 4.4 inches — Công suất thiết kế 75 W 75 W Bộ nguồn khuyến nghị 250 W — Đầu ra 1x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort No outputs Đầu nối nguồn None — Số bảng mạch PG210 SKU 1 — Tính năng đồ hoạDirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (11_0) OpenGL 4.6 4.6 OpenCL 3.0 3.0 Vulkan 1.2 1.1 CUDA 6.1 5.0 Mô hình đổ bóng 6.4 5.1 Các tính năng khácĐồ hoạ di độngNgày phát hành — Mar 13th, 2015 Thế hệ — GeForce 900M Sản xuất — End-of-life Giao diện Bus — PCIe 3.0 x8 Tiền nhiệm — GeForce 800M Kế vị — GeForce 10 Mobile General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Pipelines / CUDA cores640640CUDA cores640640Core clock speed1290 MHz914 MHzBoost clock speed1392 MHz1124 MHzNumber of transistors3,300 million1,870 millionManufacturing process technology14 nm28 nmPower consumption (TDP)75 Watt75 WattMaximum GPU temperature97 °Cno dataTexture fill rate58.2044.96Floating-point performance1,862 gflops1,439 gflops Size and compatibilityInformation on GeForce GTX 1050 and GeForce GTX 950M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard. Laptop sizeno datamedium sizedBus supportPCIe 3.0PCI Express 3.0InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8Length5.7" (14.5 cm)no dataHeight4.38" (11.1 cm)no dataWidth2-slotno dataRecommended system power (PSU)300 Wattno dataSupplementary power connectorsNoneno dataSLI options-+SLI-no data MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5DDR3 or GDDR5Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GBMemory bus width128 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed7008 MHz1000 or 2500 MHzMemory bandwidth112 GB/s32 or 80 GB/sShared memory-- Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display ConnectorsDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVINo outputsMulti monitor support+no dataVGA аnalog display supportno data+DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno data+HDMI++HDCP2.2no dataG-SYNC support+no data TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. GameStream++GeForce ShadowPlayno data+GPU Boost3.02.0GameWorksno data+H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoderno data+Optimusno data+BatteryBoostno data+VR Ready+no dataAnsel++ API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)Shader Model6.45.1OpenGL4.54.5OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126CUDA++ Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. 1050 outperforms 950M by 96% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% 1050 outperforms 950M by 96% in Passmark. 3DMark Vantage Performance3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% 1050 outperforms 950M by 107% in 3DMark Vantage Performance. 3DMark 11 Performance GPU3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% 1050 outperforms 950M by 96% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% 1050 outperforms 950M by 112% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. 3DMark Cloud Gate GPUCloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% 1050 outperforms 950M by 92% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU. GeekBench 5 OpenCLGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% 1050 outperforms 950M by 75% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL. 3DMark Ice Storm GPUIce Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 8% 1050 outperforms 950M by 76% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU. GeekBench 5 VulkanGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% 1050 outperforms 950M by 108% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan. GeekBench 5 CUDAGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 4% 1050 outperforms 950M by 74% in GeekBench 5 CUDA. Unigine Heaven 3.0This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine. Benchmark coverage: 4% 1050 outperforms 950M by 110% in Unigine Heaven 3.0. Mining hashratesCryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 1050 and GeForce GTX 950M. Usually measured in megahashes per second. Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 279 Mh/s 140 Mh/s Decred / DCR (Decred) 0.85 Gh/s no data Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) no data 2.5 Mh/s Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.3 kh/s no data Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 143.76 Sol/s no data Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: Full HD45 30 1440p24 21 4K22 16 Performance in popular gamesFull HD Low Preset Cyberpunk 207720−22 10−12 Full HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey38 +65.2% 23 −65.2% Assassin's Creed Valhalla21−24 +200% 7−8 −200% Battlefield 556 +80.6% 31 −80.6% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare34 +70% 20−22 −70% Cyberpunk 207720−22 +81.8% 10−12 −81.8% Far Cry 530−35 +47.8% 23 −47.8% Far Cry New Dawn41 +86.4% 22 −86.4% Forza Horizon 445−50 +100% 21−24 −100% Hitman 335−40 +119% 16−18 −119% Horizon Zero Dawn27−30 +108% 12−14 −108% Red Dead Redemption 231 +158% 12−14 −158% Shadow of the Tomb Raider27 +42.1% 19 −42.1% Watch Dogs: Legion24−27 +140% 10−11 −140% Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey26 +36.8% 19 −36.8% Assassin's Creed Valhalla21−24 +200% 7−8 −200% Battlefield 543 +65.4% 26 −65.4% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare24 +20% 20−22 −20% Cyberpunk 207720−22 +81.8% 10−12 −81.8% Far Cry 530−35 +61.9% 21 −61.9% Far Cry New Dawn38 +90% 20 −90% Forza Horizon 449 +113% 21−24 −113% Hitman 335−40 +119% 16−18 −119% Horizon Zero Dawn27−30 +108% 12−14 −108% Metro Exodus17 +240% 5 −240% Red Dead Redemption 29 −33.3% 12−14 +33.3% Shadow of the Tomb Raider24 +60% 15 −60% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt38 +100% 19 −100% Watch Dogs: Legion24−27 +140% 10−11 −140% Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey15 +36.4% 11 −36.4% Assassin's Creed Valhalla21−24 +200% 7−8 −200% Battlefield 536 +80% 20 −80% Cyberpunk 207720−22 +81.8% 10−12 −81.8% Far Cry 530−35 +78.9% 19 −78.9% Far Cry New Dawn35 +84.2% 19 −84.2% Forza Horizon 434 +47.8% 21−24 −47.8% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt20 +81.8% 11 −81.8% Watch Dogs: Legion24−27 +140% 10−11 −140% 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare18−20 +90% 10−11 −90% Hitman 320−22 +81.8% 10−12 −81.8% Horizon Zero Dawn18−20 +58.3% 12−14 −58.3% Metro Exodus12−14 +140% 5−6 −140% Red Dead Redemption 29−10 +125% 4−5 −125% Shadow of the Tomb Raider16−18 +77.8% 9−10 −77.8% 1440p Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey12−14 +225% 4−5 −225% Assassin's Creed Valhalla9−10 0−1 Battlefield 527 +350% 6−7 −350% Cyberpunk 20777−8 +133% 3−4 −133% Far Cry 521−24 +75% 12 −75% Far Cry New Dawn25 +178% 9−10 −178% Forza Horizon 424−27 +127% 10−12 −127% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt16−18 +220% 5−6 −220% Watch Dogs: Legion8−9 +300% 2−3 −300% 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare9−10 +80% 5−6 −80% Hitman 312−14 +100% 6−7 −100% Horizon Zero Dawn10−11 +25% 8−9 −25% Metro Exodus6−7 +500% 1−2 −500% Red Dead Redemption 27−8 +133% 3−4 −133% Shadow of the Tomb Raider7−8 +250% 2−3 −250% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt15 +400% 3−4 −400% 4K Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey8−9 +167% 3−4 −167% Assassin's Creed Valhalla6−7 +200% 2−3 −200% Battlefield 512−14 +333% 3−4 −333% Cyberpunk 20772−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Far Cry 510−11 +66.7% 6 −66.7% Far Cry New Dawn11 +22.2% 9−10 −22.2% Forza Horizon 416−18 +113% 8−9 −113% Watch Dogs: Legion5−6 +400% 1−2 −400% This is how GTX 1050 and GTX 950M compete in popular games: 1080p resolution:
1440p resolution:
4K resolution:
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
All in all, in popular games:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 13.02 6.65 Recency 25 October 2016 12 March 2015 Memory bandwidth 112 32 Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm The GeForce GTX 1050 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 950M in performance tests. Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 950M is a notebook one. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce GTX 1050 GeForce GTX 950M Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
